Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kyle Cesare

dblp:164/8260 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0006-9068-1787ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Legged, aerial and field robots · 79% Reinforcement learning · 21%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Computer animation and physical simulation · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › legged robots
legged robot locomotion
0.812024
Interactive Design of Stylized Walking Gaits for Robotic Characters · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024
Human-robot interaction › entertainment robotics
robot animation
0.212024
Interactive Design of Stylized Walking Gaits for Robotic Characters · ACM Trans. Graph. 2024
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › exploration
multi-robot exploration
0.212015
Multi-UAV exploration with limited communication and battery · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › aerial robots
multi-UAV systems
0.112015
Multi-UAV exploration with limited communication and battery · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

procedural animation · 2.3phase-space blending · 2.3model-based control · 2.3frontier-based exploration · 0.2adaptive coordination · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Interactive Design of Stylized Walking Gaits for Robotic Characters
abstract
Procedural animation has seen widespread use in the design of expressive walking gaits for virtual characters. While similar tools could breathe life into robotic characters, existing techniques are largely unaware of the kinematic and dynamic constraints imposed by physical robots. In this paper, we propose a system for the artist-directed authoring of stylized bipedal walking gaits, tailored for execution on robotic characters. The artist interfaces with an interactive editing tool that generates the desired character motion in realtime, either on the physical or simulated robot, using a model-based control stack. Each walking style is encoded as a set of sample parameters which are translated into whole-body reference trajectories using the proposed procedural animation technique. In order to generalize the stylized gait over a continuous range of input velocities, we employ a phase-space blending strategy that interpolates a set of example walk cycles authored by the animator while preserving contact constraints. To demonstrate the utility of our approach, we animate gaits for a custom, free-walking robotic character, and show, with two additional in-simulation examples, how our procedural animation technique generalizes to bipeds with different degrees of freedom, proportions, and mass distributions.
Michael A. Hopkins, Georg Wiedebach, Kyle Cesare, Jared Bishop, Espen Knoop, Moritz Bächer
ACM Trans. Graph.3
2015 Multi-UAV exploration with limited communication and battery
abstract
We propose a multi-robot exploration algorithm that uses adaptive coordination to provide heterogeneous behavior. The key idea is to maximize the efficiency of exploring and mapping an unknown environment when a team is faced with unreliable communication and limited battery life (e.g., with aerial rotorcraft). The proposed algorithm utilizes four states: explore, meet, sacrifice, and relay. The explore state uses a frontier-based exploration algorithm, the meet state returns to the last known location of communication to share data, the sacrifice state sends the robot out to explore without consideration of remaining battery, and the relay state lands the robot until a meeting occurs. This approach allows robots to take on the role of a relay to improve communication between team members. In addition, the robots can “sacrifice” themselves by continuing to explore even when they do not have sufficient battery to return to the base station. We compare the performance of the proposed approach to state-of-the-art frontier-based exploration, and results show gains in explored area. The feasibility of components of the proposed approach is also demonstrated on a team of two custom-built quadcopters exploring an office environment.
Kyle Cesare, Ryan Skeele, Soo-Hyun Yoo, Geoffrey A. Hollinger
ICRA1