Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Parsa Mahmoudieh
dblp:164/8264
· DBLP profile ↗
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2022
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 4 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Reinforcement learning · 70% Robot manipulation · 13% Vision and language · 7% |
Topics — the 7 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › goal-conditioned reinforcement learning
language-conditioned policy learning |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Reward Specification via Grounded Natural Language · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
reward design |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Reward Specification via Grounded Natural Language · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
imitation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Zero-Shot Visual Imitation · ICLR 2018 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › imitation learning › learning from observation
visual imitation |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Zero-Shot Visual Imitation · ICLR 2018 |
Computer vision › Vision and language
vision-language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Reward Specification via Grounded Natural Language · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Zero-Shot Reward Specification via Grounded Natural Language · ICML 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
visual representation learning |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | Zero-Shot Visual Imitation · ICLR 2018 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
policy distillation · 0.6contrastive vision-language pretraining · 0.6CLIP · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2022 | Zero-Shot Reward Specification via Grounded Natural LanguageabstractReward signals in reinforcement learning are expensive to design and often require access to the true state which is not available in the real world. Common alternatives are usually demonstrations or goal images which can be labor-intensive to collect. On the other hand, text descriptions provide a general, natural, and low-effort way of communicating the desired task. However, prior works in learning text-conditioned policies still rely on rewards that are defined using either true state or labeled expert demonstrations. We use recent developments in building large-scale visuolanguage models like CLIP to devise a framework that generates the task reward signal just from goal text description and raw pixel observations which is then used to learn the task policy. We evaluate the proposed framework on control and robotic manipulation tasks. Finally, we distill the individual task policies into a single goal text conditioned policy that can generalize in a zero-shot manner to new tasks with unseen objects and unseen goal text descriptions. Parsa Mahmoudieh, Deepak Pathak, Trevor Darrell |
ICML | 1 |
| 2018 | Zero-Shot Visual Imitation
Deepak Pathak, Parsa Mahmoudieh, Guanghao Luo, Pulkit Agrawal 0001, Dian Chen 0001, Yide Shentu, Evan Shelhamer, Jitendra Malik, Alexei A. Efros, Trevor Darrell |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2016 | Modeling and control of an ornithopter for divingabstractThis paper details a method for identifying a set of piece-wise affine linear models that can be used for control design for flapping-winged flight. The paper focuses on diving maneuvers as the application for these models. The flight conditions during the dive are segmented into separate dynamically similar regions, and least-squares is used to estimate affine linear models for each modeling region. These models are used to compute the reachability sets that satisfy recovery conditions for safe diving. The point within the dive to begin recovery was determined by checking the current pose for inclusion in the backward reachable set. Using this control method, 2.2 meter dives were achieved at a success rate of 60 percent. The data-driven automatic modeling techniques and controller design processes can be extended to additional flight maneuvers, provided sufficient previous data have been collected for model generation of those maneuvers. Cameron J. Rose, Parsa Mahmoudieh, Ronald S. Fearing |
IROS | 2 |
| 2015 | Coordinated launching of an ornithopter with a hexapedal robotabstractIn this work, we develop a cooperative launching system for a 13.2 gram ornithopter micro-aerial vehicle (MAV), the H2Bird, by carrying it on the back of a 32 gram hexapedal millirobot, the VelociRoACH. We determine the necessary initial velocity and pitch angle for take off using force data collected in a wind tunnel and use the VelociRoACH to reach these initial conditions for successful launch. In the wind tunnel predicted success region, we were able to complete a successful launch for 75 percent of the 12 trials in that region. Although carrying the H2Bird on top of the VelociRoACH at a stride frequency of 17 Hz increases our average power consumption by about 24.5 percent over solo running, the H2Bird, in turn, provides stability advantages to the VelociRoACH. We observed that the variance in pitch and roll velocity with the H2Bird is about 90 percent less than without. Additionally, with the H2Bird flapping at 5 Hz during transport, we observed an increase of 12.7 percent of the steady state velocity. Lastly, we found that the costs of transport for carrying the H2Bird flapping and without (6.6 and 6.8) are lower than the solo costs of transport for the VelociRoACH and for the H2Bird (8.1 and 10.1). Cameron J. Rose, Parsa Mahmoudieh, Ronald S. Fearing |
ICRA | 2 |