Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alexander G. Cunningham

dblp:164/8645 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 3 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot navigation and mapping · 50% Reinforcement learning · 22% Multi-agent systems · 22%

Topics — the 6 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › multi-robot localization
cooperative localization
0.212015
Cooperative localization by factor composition over a faulty low-bandwidth communication channel · ICRA 2015
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › online decision making
decision-making for autonomous driving
0.212015
MPDM: Multipolicy decision-making in dynamic, uncertain environments for autonomous driving · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
factor graph estimation
0.212015
Cooperative localization by factor composition over a faulty low-bandwidth communication channel · ICRA 2015
Knowledge, reasoning and agents › Multi-agent systems
multi-agent decision making
0.212015
MPDM: Multipolicy decision-making in dynamic, uncertain environments for autonomous driving · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
motion planning
0.112015
MPDM: Multipolicy decision-making in dynamic, uncertain environments for autonomous driving · ICRA 2015
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization › GPS-denied localization
underwater localization
0.112015
Cooperative localization by factor composition over a faulty low-bandwidth communication channel · ICRA 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

one-way-travel-time · 0.2multipolicy decision-making · 0.2forward simulation · 0.2factor composition · 0.2cost function scoring · 0.2approximate marginalization · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 MPDM: Multipolicy decision-making in dynamic, uncertain environments for autonomous driving
abstract
Real-world autonomous driving in city traffic must cope with dynamic environments including other agents with uncertain intentions. This poses a challenging decision-making problem, e.g., deciding when to perform a passing maneuver or how to safely merge into traffic. Previous work in the literature has typically approached the problem using ad-hoc solutions that do not consider the possible future states of other agents, and thus have difficulty scaling to complex traffic scenarios where the actions of participating agents are tightly conditioned on one another. In this paper we present multipolicy decision-making (MPDM), a decision-making algorithm that exploits knowledge from the autonomous driving domain to make decisions online for an autonomous vehicle navigating in traffic. By assuming the controlled vehicle and other traffic participants execute a policy from a set of plausible closed-loop policies at every timestep, the algorithm selects the best available policy for the controlled vehicle to execute. We perform policy election using forward simulation of both the controlled vehicle and other agents, efficiently sampling from the high-likelihood outcomes of their interactions. We then score the resulting outcomes using a user-defined cost function to accommodate different driving preferences, and select the policy with the highest score. We demonstrate the algorithm on a real-world autonomous vehicle performing passing maneuvers and in a simulated merging scenario.
Alexander G. Cunningham, Enric Galceran, Ryan M. Eustice, Edwin Olson
ICRA1
2015 Cooperative localization by factor composition over a faulty low-bandwidth communication channel
abstract
This paper reports on an underwater cooperative localization algorithm for faulty low-bandwidth communication channels based on a factor graph estimation framework. Vehicles measure the one-way-travel-time (OWTT) of acoustic broadcasts to obtain a relative range observation to the transmitting vehicle. We present a method to robustly share locally observed sensor data across the network by exploiting odometry factor composition. Our algorithm calls on approximate marginalization techniques to compute a compact set of informative factors that enable local navigation data to be shared efficiently. We provide results from a real-time implementation of our algorithm using two autonomous underwater vehicles and a surface vehicle.
Jeffrey M. Walls, Alexander G. Cunningham, Ryan M. Eustice
ICRA2
2015 Continuous-time estimation for dynamic obstacle tracking
abstract
This paper reports on a system for dynamic obstacle tracking for autonomous vehicles. In this work, we seek to simultaneously estimate both the trajectory of the obstacle and the obstacle's shape. These two tasks are inherently coupled-given only noisy partial views, one cannot accurately estimate the trajectory of an obstacle if its shape is unknown, nor can one estimate its shape without knowing its trajectory. To address this challenge, we note that simultaneous localization and mapping (SLAM), where a robot must build a map of the environment while localizing itself within the map, presents similar challenges. By treating the obstacle's shape as a “map” in the obstacle's moving reference frame, we can formulate the obstacle tracking and shape estimation similarly to SLAM. Additionally, we use a continuous time estimation framework to incorporate sensor data that is collected at a fast rate (e.g., light detection and ranging (LIDAR)). Using these methods, we are able to obtain smooth trajectories and crisp point clouds for tracked obstacles. We test our proposed tracker on real-world data collected by our autonomous vehicle platform and demonstrate that it produces improved results when compared to a standard centroid-based extended Kalman filter (EKF) tracker.
Arash K. Ushani, Nicholas Carlevaris-Bianco, Alexander G. Cunningham, Enric Galceran, Ryan M. Eustice
IROS3