Working memory (WM) supports the temporary retention of task-relevant information. It is limited in capacity and inherently noisy. The ability to flexibly allocate WM resource is a hallmark of adaptive behavior. While it is well established that WM resource can be prioritized via selective attention, whether they can be allocated based on reward incentive alone remains under debate—raising open questions about whether humans can efficiently allocate WM resource based on utility. To address this, we conducted behavioral experiments using orientations as stimuli. Participants first learned stimulus–reward associations and then performed a delayed estimate WM task. We found that WM precision, indexed by the variability of memory reports, reflected both natural stimulus priors and utility-based allocation. The effects from reward and prior on memory variability both grew over time, indicating their effects in stabilizing memory representations. In contrast, memory bias was largely unaffected by time or reward. To interpret these findings, we extended efficient coding theory by incorporating time and reformulating the objective from minimizing estimation loss to maximizing expected utility. We showed that the behavioral results were consistent with an observer that efficiently allocates WM resource over time to maximize utility. Lastly, we trained recurrent neural networks (RNNs) to perform the same WM task under a 2×2 design: prior (uniform vs. natural) × reward policy (baseline vs. reward context). Human-like behaviors emerged in RNNs: memory was more stable (lower variability) for stimuli associated with higher probability or rewards, and these effects increased over time. Transfer learning showed that recurrent dynamics were crucial for adapting to different priors and reward policies. Together, these results provide converging behavioral and computational evidence that WM resource allocation is shaped by environmental statistics and rewards, offering insight into how intelligent systems can dynamically optimize memory for utility under resource constraints.

In interocular suppression, a suprathreshold monocular target can be rendered invisible by a salient competitor stimulus presented in the other eye. Despite decades of research on interocular suppression and related phenomena (e.g., binocular rivalry, flash suppression, continuous flash suppression), the neural processing underlying interocular suppression is still unknown. We developed and tested a computational model of interocular suppression. The model included two processes that contributed to the strength of interocular suppression: divisive normalization and attentional modulation. According to the model, the salient competitor induced a stimulus-driven attentional modulation selective for the location and orientation of the competitor, thereby increasing the gain of neural responses to the competitor and reducing the gain of neural responses to the target. Additional suppression was induced by divisive normalization in the model, similar to other forms of visual masking. To test the model, we conducted psychophysics experiments in which both the size and the eye-of-origin of the competitor were manipulated. For small and medium competitors, behavioral performance was consonant with a change in the response gain of neurons that responded to the target. But large competitors induced a contrast-gain change, even when the competitor was split between the two eyes. The model correctly predicted these results and outperformed an alternative model in which the attentional modulation was eye specific. We conclude that both stimulus-driven attention (selective for location and feature) and divisive normalization contribute to interocular suppression.