Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Chris Olah

dblp:166/1232 · also Christopher Olah · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Generative modeling · 67% Trustworthy machine learning · 18% Image recognition and object detection · 16%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative adversarial network
0.622018
Is Generator Conditioning Causally Related to GAN Performance? · ICML 2018
Conditional Image Synthesis with Auxiliary Classifier GANs · ICML 2017
Machine learning › Generative modeling
generative model evaluation
0.312018
Is Generator Conditioning Causally Related to GAN Performance? · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability
0.312018
Is Generator Conditioning Causally Related to GAN Performance? · ICML 2018
Machine learning › Generative modeling › image generation
conditional image synthesis
0.312017
Conditional Image Synthesis with Auxiliary Classifier GANs · ICML 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
image quality assessment
0.312017
Conditional Image Synthesis with Auxiliary Classifier GANs · ICML 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

regularization · 0.3jacobian clamping · 0.3label conditioning · 0.3auxiliary classifier · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Is Generator Conditioning Causally Related to GAN Performance?
abstract
Recent work suggests that controlling the entire distribution of Jacobian singular values is an important design consideration in deep learning. Motivated by this, we study the distribution of singular values of the Jacobian of the generator in Generative Adversarial Networks. We find that this Jacobian generally becomes ill-conditioned at the beginning of training. Moreover, we find that the average (across the latent space) conditioning of the generator is highly predictive of two other ad-hoc metrics for measuring the “quality” of trained GANs: the Inception Score and the Frechet Inception Distance. We then test the hypothesis that this relationship is causal by proposing a “regularization” technique (called Jacobian Clamping) that softly penalizes the condition number of the generator Jacobian. Jacobian Clamping improves the mean score for nearly all datasets on which we tested it. It also greatly reduces inter-run variance of the aforementioned scores, addressing (at least partially) one of the main criticisms of GANs.
Augustus Odena, Jacob Buckman, Catherine Olsson, Tom B. Brown, Chris Olah, Colin Raffel, Ian J. Goodfellow
ICML5
2017 Conditional Image Synthesis with Auxiliary Classifier GANs
abstract
In this paper we introduce new methods for the improved training of generative adversarial networks (GANs) for image synthesis. We construct a variant of GANs employing label conditioning that results in $128\times 128$ resolution image samples exhibiting global coherence. We expand on previous work for image quality assessment to provide two new analyses for assessing the discriminability and diversity of samples from class-conditional image synthesis models. These analyses demonstrate that high resolution samples provide class information not present in low resolution samples. Across 1000 ImageNet classes, $128\times 128$ samples are more than twice as discriminable as artificially resized $32\times 32$ samples. In addition, 84.7\% of the classes have samples exhibiting diversity comparable to real ImageNet data.
Augustus Odena, Chris Olah, Jonathon Shlens
ICML2