Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Daniele Sportillo

dblp:166/9041 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-5504-1297ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2 · 2 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
2 papers
Virtual and augmented reality · 100%
Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
2 papers
Human-robot interaction · 79% Usability and user experience research · 21%
Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Autonomous driving · 100%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 6, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › automated vehicle interaction
take-over request
0.412019
On-Road Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Training · HRI 2019
Virtual and augmented reality
immersive interaction
0.312018
Light Virtual Reality Systems for the Training of Conditionally Automated Vehicle Drivers · VR 2018
Virtual and augmented reality › immersive interaction
virtual reality training
0.312018
Light Virtual Reality Systems for the Training of Conditionally Automated Vehicle Drivers · VR 2018
Usability and user experience research
user experience evaluation
0.112018
Light Virtual Reality Systems for the Training of Conditionally Automated Vehicle Drivers · VR 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

questionnaire · 1.0head-mounted display · 1.0driving simulator · 1.0between-subject study · 0.8wizard-of-oz · 0.4wizard of oz · 0.4
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 On-Road Evaluation of Autonomous Driving Training
abstract
Driver interaction with increasingly automated vehicles requires prior knowledge of system capabilities, operational know-how to use novel car equipment and responsiveness to unpredictable situations. With the purpose of getting drivers ready for autonomous driving, in a between-subject study sixty inexperienced participants were trained with an on-board video tutorial, an Augmented Reality (AR) program and a Virtual Reality (VR) simulator. To evaluate the transfer of training to real driving scenarios, a test drive on public roads was conducted implementing, for the first time in these conditions, the Wizard of Oz (WoZ) protocol. Results suggest that VR and AR training can foster knowledge acquisition and improve reaction time performance in take-over requests. Moreover, participants' behavior during the test drive highlights the ecological validity of the experiment thanks to the effective implementation of the WoZ methodology.
Daniele Sportillo, Alexis Paljic, Luciano Ojeda
HRI1
2018 Light Virtual Reality Systems for the Training of Conditionally Automated Vehicle Drivers
abstract
In conditionally automated vehicles, drivers can engage in secondary activities while traveling to their destination. However, drivers are required to appropriately respond, in a limited amount of time, to a take-over request when the system reaches its functional boundaries. In this context, Virtual Reality systems represent a promising training and learning tool to properly familiarize drivers with the automated vehicle and allow them to interact with the novel equipment involved. In this study, the effectiveness of an Head-Mounted display (HMD)-based training program for acquiring interaction skills in automated cars was compared to a user manual and a fixed-base simulator. Results show that the training system affects the take-over performances evaluated in a test drive in a high-end driving simulator. Moreover, self-reported measures indicate that the HMD-based training is preferred with respect to the other systems.
Daniele Sportillo, Alexis Paljic, Luciano Ojeda, Philippe Fuchs, Vincent Roussarie
VR1