Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Luisa Siniscalchi
dblp:167/2782
· DBLP profile ↗
26ranked-venue papers
1as first author
16since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0003-1813-1132ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Security and privacy · 21 · 1 first-author · 14 since 2021Theory of computation · 7 · 4 since 2021Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 3 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
13 papers |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 92% Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis · 4% Privacy and data protection · 4% |
Topics — the 21 heaviest of 22, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
3.5 | 5 | 2025 | Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Computation from Polynomial-Time Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2025 Broadcast-Optimal Secure Computation from Black-Box Oblivious Transfer · ASIACRYPT (5) 2025 Minimizing Setup in Broadcast-Optimal Two Round MPC · EUROCRYPT (2) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
oblivious transfer |
1.5 | 2 | 2025 | Broadcast-Optimal Secure Computation from Black-Box Oblivious Transfer · ASIACRYPT (5) 2025 List Oblivious Transfer and Applications to Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Coin Tossing · CRYPTO (1) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation › round complexity
round-optimal protocols |
1.4 | 2 | 2025 | Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Computation from Polynomial-Time Assumptions · EUROCRYPT (5) 2025 Round-Optimal Multi-party Computation with Identifiable Abort · EUROCRYPT (1) 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › succinct arguments
succinct non-interactive arguments |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Universally Composable SNARKs with Transparent Setup without Programmable Random Oracle · CRYPTO (7) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › composable security
universally composable security |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Universally Composable SNARKs with Transparent Setup without Programmable Random Oracle · CRYPTO (7) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs › non-interactive zero-knowledge proofs
zk-SNARK |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Universally Composable SNARKs with Transparent Setup without Programmable Random Oracle · CRYPTO (7) 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems › zero-knowledge proofs
non-malleable zero knowledge |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box (and Fast) Non-malleable Zero Knowledge · CRYPTO (9) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › proof systems
zero-knowledge proofs |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Black-Box (and Fast) Non-malleable Zero Knowledge · CRYPTO (9) 2024 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation › round complexity
two-round MPC |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Minimizing Setup in Broadcast-Optimal Two Round MPC · EUROCRYPT (2) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation › active security
identifiable abort |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Round-Optimal Multi-party Computation with Identifiable Abort · EUROCRYPT (1) 2022 |
Privacy and data protection › differential privacy
privacy amplification |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Privacy Amplification With Tamperable Memory via Non-Malleable Two-Source Extractors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
commitment schemes |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Four-Round Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-Way Functions · CRYPTO (2) 2017 Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments (and More) in 3 Rounds · CRYPTO (3) 2016 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes › non-malleable commitments
concurrent non-malleable commitments |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Four-Round Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-Way Functions · CRYPTO (2) 2017 Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments (and More) in 3 Rounds · CRYPTO (3) 2016 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › commitment schemes
non-malleable commitments |
0.5 | 2 | 2017 | Four-Round Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-Way Functions · CRYPTO (2) 2017 Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments (and More) in 3 Rounds · CRYPTO (3) 2016 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
randomness extraction |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | How to Extract Useful Randomness from Unreliable Sources · EUROCRYPT (1) 2020 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › interactive proofs
sigma protocols |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Online/Offline OR Composition of Sigma Protocols · EUROCRYPT (2) 2016 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
coin flipping |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | List Oblivious Transfer and Applications to Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Coin Tossing · CRYPTO (1) 2023 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › coin flipping
multiparty coin tossing |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | List Oblivious Transfer and Applications to Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Coin Tossing · CRYPTO (1) 2023 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis › randomness extraction
non-malleable extractors |
0.2 | 1 | 2022 | Privacy Amplification With Tamperable Memory via Non-Malleable Two-Source Extractors · IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory 2022 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation › secure multiparty computation
honest-majority MPC |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Broadcast-Optimal Two Round MPC with an Honest Majority · CRYPTO (2) 2021 |
Cryptographic primitives and cryptanalysis
one-way functions |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Four-Round Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-Way Functions · CRYPTO (2) 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
transparent setup · 0.9polynomial-time assumptions · 0.9oblivious transfer · 0.9non-programmable random oracle · 0.9trapdoor permutations · 0.6one-way functions · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | Broadcast-Optimal Secure Computation from Black-Box Oblivious Transfer
Michele Ciampi, Divya Ravi 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi, Yu Xia 0008 |
ASIACRYPT (5) | 3 |
| 2025 | Universally Composable SNARKs with Transparent Setup without Programmable Random Oracle
Christian Badertscher, Matteo Campanelli, Michele Ciampi, Luigi Russo 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi |
CRYPTO (7) | 5 |
| 2025 | Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Computation from Polynomial-Time Assumptions
Michele Ciampi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Luisa Siniscalchi, Hendrik Waldner |
EUROCRYPT (5) | 3 |
| 2025 | Short Paper: Rewardable Naysayer Proofs
Gennaro Avitabile, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
FC (2) | 2 |
| 2025 | Information-Theoretic Broadcast-Optimal MPC
Michele Ciampi, Ivan Damgård, Divya Ravi 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi, Sophia Yakoubov |
TCC (1) | 4 |
| 2024 | Black-Box (and Fast) Non-malleable Zero Knowledge
Vincenzo Botta, Michele Ciampi, Emmanuela Orsini, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
CRYPTO (9) | 4 |
| 2024 | Incremental Time-Deniable Signatures
Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
ESORICS (4) | 1 |
| 2023 | List Oblivious Transfer and Applications to Round-Optimal Black-Box Multiparty Coin Tossing
Michele Ciampi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Luisa Siniscalchi, Hendrik Waldner |
CRYPTO (1) | 3 |
| 2023 | Minimizing Setup in Broadcast-Optimal Two Round MPC
Ivan Damgård, Divya Ravi 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi, Sophia Yakoubov |
EUROCRYPT (2) | 3 |
| 2023 | Broadcast-Optimal Four-Round MPC in the Plain Model
Michele Ciampi, Ivan Damgård, Divya Ravi 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi, Yu Xia 0008, Sophia Yakoubov |
TCC (2) | 4 |
| 2022 | Round-Optimal Multi-party Computation with Identifiable AbortabstractSecure multi-party computation (MPC) protocols that are resilient to a dishonest majority allow the adversary to get the output of the computation while, at the same time, forcing the honest parties to abort. Aumann and Lindell introduced the enhanced notion of security with identifiable abort , which still allows the adversary to trigger an abort but, at the same time, it enables the honest parties to agree on the identity of the party that led to the abort. More recently, in Eurocrypt 2016, Garg et al. showed that, assuming access to a simultaneous message exchange channel for all the parties, at least four rounds of communication are required to securely realize non-trivial functionalities in the plain model. Following Garg et al., a sequence of works has matched this lower bound, but none of them achieved security with identifiable abort. In this work, we close this gap and show that four rounds of communication are also sufficient to securely realize any functionality with identifiable abort using standard and generic polynomial-time assumptions. To achieve this result we introduce the new notion of bounded-rewind secure MPC that guarantees security even against an adversary that performs a mild form of reset attacks. We show how to instantiate this primitive starting from any MPC protocol and by assuming trapdoor-permutations. The notion of bounded-rewind secure MPC allows for easier parallel composition of MPC protocols with other (interactive) cryptographic primitives. Therefore, we believe that this primitive can be useful in other contexts in which it is crucial to combine multiple primitives with MPC protocols while keeping the round complexity of the final protocol low. Michele Ciampi, Divya Ravi 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi, Hendrik Waldner |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 3 |
| 2022 | Four-Round Black-Box Non-malleable Schemes from One-Way Permutations
Michele Ciampi, Emmanuela Orsini, Luisa Siniscalchi |
TCC (2) | 3 |
| 2022 | Role Mining Heuristics for Permission-Role-Usage Cardinality ConstraintsabstractAbstract Role-based access control (RBAC) has become a de facto standard to control access to restricted resources in complex systems and is widely deployed in many commercially available applications, including operating systems, databases and other softwares. The migration process towards RBAC, starting from the current access configuration, relies on the design of role mining techniques, whose aim is to define suitable roles that implement the given access policies. Some constraints can be used to transform the roles automatically output by the mining procedures and effectively capture the organization’s status under analysis. Such constraints can limit the final configuration characteristics, such as the number of roles assigned to a user, or the number of permissions included in a role, and produce a resulting role set that is effectively usable in real-world situations. In this paper, we consider two constraints: the number of permissions a role can include and the number of roles assigned to any user. In particular, we present two heuristics that produce roles compliant with both constraints and evaluate their performances using both real-world and synthetic datasets. Carlo Blundo, Stelvio Cimato, Luisa Siniscalchi |
Comput. J. | 3 |
| 2022 | Privacy Amplification With Tamperable Memory via Non-Malleable Two-Source ExtractorsabstractWe extend the classical problem of privacy amplification to a setting where the active adversary, Eve, is also allowed tofully corruptthe internal memory (which includes the shared randomness, and local randomness tape) of one of the honest parties, Alice and Bob, before the execution of the protocol. We require that either one of Alice or Bob detects tampering, or they agree on a shared key that is indistinguishable from the uniform distribution to Eve. We obtain the following results: 1) we give a privacy amplification protocol via low-error non-malleable two-source extractors with one source having low min-entropy. In particular, this implies the existence of such (non-efficient) protocols; 2) we show that even slight improvements to the state-of-the-art explicit non-malleable two-source extractors would lead to explicit low-error, low min-entropy two-source extractors, thereby resolving a long-standing open question. This suggests that obtaining (information-theoretically secure)explicitnon-malleable two-source extractors for (1) might be hard; 3) we present explicit constructions of low-error, low min-entropy non-malleable two-source extractors in the CRS model of (Garg, Kalai, Khurana, Eurocrypt 2020), assuming either the quasi-polynomial hardness of DDH or the existence of nearly-optimal collision-resistant hash functions; 4) we instantiate our privacy amplification protocol with the above mentioned non-malleable two-source extractors in the CRS model, leading to explicit, computationally-secure protocols. This is not immediate from (1) because in the computational setting we need to make sure that, in particular, all randomness sources remain samplable throughout the proof. This requires upgrading the assumption of quasi-polynomial hardness of DDH to sub-exponential hardness of DDH.We emphasize that each of the first three results can be read independently. Divesh Aggarwal, Maciej Obremski, João Ribeiro 0002, Mark Simkin 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi |
IEEE Trans. Inf. Theory | 5 |
| 2021 | Broadcast-Optimal Two Round MPC with an Honest Majority
Ivan Damgård, Bernardo Magri, Divya Ravi 0001, Luisa Siniscalchi, Sophia Yakoubov |
CRYPTO (2) | 4 |
| 2021 | Balancing Privacy and Accountability in Blockchain Identity Management
Ivan Damgård, Chaya Ganesh, Hamidreza Khoshakhlagh, Claudio Orlandi, Luisa Siniscalchi |
CT-RSA | 5 |
| 2020 | How to Extract Useful Randomness from Unreliable Sources
Divesh Aggarwal, Maciej Obremski, João Ribeiro 0002, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
EUROCRYPT (1) | 4 |
| 2019 | An intelligent and private method to profile social network usersabstractIn this paper, we propose an intelligent and private method to profile social network users. The scenario is constituted by the social network platform and an advertiser willing to expose its products to potentially interested users. The intelligence is in the use of text analysis services (like Wikify!) to extract knowledge from the social networks posts and get measure criteria to compare them, by using Rough Set Theory. The private layer guarantees that neither of the parties in the scenario can gain any advantage by knowing information (tastes, users topic adherence, etc...) of the other party. Carlo Blundo, Carmen De Maio, Mimmo Parente, Luisa Siniscalchi |
FUZZ-IEEE | 4 |
| 2018 | PostProcessing in Constrained Role Mining
Carlo Blundo, Stelvio Cimato, Luisa Siniscalchi |
IDEAL (1) | 3 |
| 2018 | Continuous NMC Secure Against Permutations and Overwrites, with Applications to CCA Secure Commitments
Ivan Damgård, Tomasz Kazana, Maciej Obremski, Varun Raj, Luisa Siniscalchi |
TCC (2) | 5 |
| 2017 | PRUCC-RM: Permission-Role-Usage Cardinality Constrained Role MiningabstractRole Based Access Control (RBAC) models have been adopted in many organizations as the standard way to implement security policies and assign access to restricted resources to roles and roles to users. To capture the business relationships within the organization and efficiently migrate towards RBAC, several role mining techniques have been defined. Constraints on the resulting roles and assignments to users can be imposed to filter out inconsistent situations produced by the automatic algorithm and to better capture the status of the organization. In this paper we are interested in constraints on the number of permissions that can be included in a role and on the number of persons a role can be assigned to. We analyze the problem and propose a couple of heuristics. The heuristics have been applied to standard datasets to validate their performance. Carlo Blundo, Stelvio Cimato, Luisa Siniscalchi |
COMPSAC (2) | 3 |
| 2017 | Four-Round Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments from One-Way Functions
Michele Ciampi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
CRYPTO (2) | 3 |
| 2017 | Round-Optimal Secure Two-Party Computation from Trapdoor Permutations
Michele Ciampi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
TCC (1) | 3 |
| 2017 | Delayed-Input Non-Malleable Zero Knowledge and Multi-Party Coin Tossing in Four Rounds
Michele Ciampi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
TCC (1) | 3 |
| 2016 | Concurrent Non-Malleable Commitments (and More) in 3 Rounds
Michele Ciampi, Rafail Ostrovsky, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
CRYPTO (3) | 3 |
| 2016 | Online/Offline OR Composition of Sigma Protocols
Michele Ciampi, Giuseppe Persiano, Alessandra Scafuro, Luisa Siniscalchi, Ivan Visconti |
EUROCRYPT (2) | 4 |