Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Marvin Blecker

dblp:167/4875 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1985
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer networks
1 paper
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks
satellite communication
0.011985
Downlinks for DBS: Design and Engineering Considerations · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1985
Vehicular, aerial and satellite networks › satellite communication
rain fade compensation
0.011985
Downlinks for DBS: Design and Engineering Considerations · IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun. 1985

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

system design optimization · 0.0subjective testing · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1985 Downlinks for DBS: Design and Engineering Considerations
abstract
The design of the downlink in a DBS system requires optimization of a set of complex interrelated objectives. This paper describes the objectives, demonstrates the interrelationships, and discusses the process of selecting system design parameters to best balance the objectives of the DBS business entity. The Satellite Television Corporation's (STC's) system design is presented as a case study. Performance requirements are stated in terms of consumer perceived picture quality and rain-fade protection. The requirements are generated by a subjective testing program. The system objectives are formulated consistent with performance requirements, competitive products, and economic reality. To meet the objectives, four major design parameters can be adjusted: satellite power, satellite antenna beam shape, home equipment performance, and signal format characteristics. This paper deals with the first three of these parameters. The manipulation of these parameters to meet system objectives is illustrated by the STC case study. It is demonstrated, for this sample system, that the choice of design parameters varies across the targeted service area, depending on demographics, competition, consumer expectations, weather, and other factors. However, in general, the STC design provides antenna sizes of 0.6-0.75 m for 92 percent of TV households, extremely high clear-sky picture ratings, and a sufficient rain-fade margin to provide acceptable levels of service outage.
Marvin Blecker, Ernesto R. Martin
IEEE J. Sel. Areas Commun.1