Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mia Primorac

dblp:167/7996 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
0000-0003-1001-1195ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Computer networks · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers
Cloud and datacenter computing · 71% Performance modeling and evaluation · 14% Energy-efficient computing · 8%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Operating systems · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Cloud and datacenter computing › datacenter services › online service systems › internet services
interactive services
0.512021
When to Hedge in Interactive Services · NSDI 2021
Operating systems › operating system design
dataplane operating system
0.312017
The IX Operating System: Combining Low Latency, High Throughput, and Efficiency in a Protected Dataplane · ACM Trans. Comput. Syst. 2017
Performance modeling and evaluation
queueing models
0.112021
When to Hedge in Interactive Services · NSDI 2021

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

zero-copy API · 0.6hardware virtualization · 0.6batching · 0.6queueing theory · 0.5hedging · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2021 When to Hedge in Interactive Services
Mia Primorac, Katerina J. Argyraki, Edouard Bugnion
NSDI1
2017 The IX Operating System: Combining Low Latency, High Throughput, and Efficiency in a Protected Dataplane
abstract
The conventional wisdom is that aggressive networking requirements, such as high packet rates for small messages and μs-scale tail latency, are best addressed outside the kernel, in a user-level networking stack. We present ix , a dataplane operating system that provides high I/O performance and high resource efficiency while maintaining the protection and isolation benefits of existing kernels. ix uses hardware virtualization to separate management and scheduling functions of the kernel (control plane) from network processing (dataplane). The dataplane architecture builds upon a native, zero-copy API and optimizes for both bandwidth and latency by dedicating hardware threads and networking queues to dataplane instances, processing bounded batches of packets to completion, and eliminating coherence traffic and multicore synchronization. The control plane dynamically adjusts core allocations and voltage/frequency settings to meet service-level objectives. We demonstrate that ix outperforms Linux and a user-space network stack significantly in both throughput and end-to-end latency. Moreover, ix improves the throughput of a widely deployed, key-value store by up to 6.4× and reduces tail latency by more than 2× . With three varying load patterns, the control plane saves 46%--54% of processor energy, and it allows background jobs to run at 35%--47% of their standalone throughput.
Adam Belay, George Prekas, Mia Primorac, Ana Klimovic, Samuel Grossman, Christoforos E. Kozyrakis, Edouard Bugnion
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.3
2017 Corrigendum to "The IX Operating System: Combining Low Latency, High Throughput and Efficiency in a Protected Dataplane"
abstract
No abstract available.
Adam Belay, George Prekas, Mia Primorac, Ana Klimovic, Samuel Grossman, Christoforos E. Kozyrakis, Edouard Bugnion
ACM Trans. Comput. Syst.3
2015 Energy proportionality and workload consolidation for latency-critical applications
abstract
Energy proportionality and workload consolidation are important objectives towards increasing efficiency in large-scale datacenters. Our work focuses on achieving these goals in the presence of applications with μs-scale tail latency requirements. Such applications represent a growing subset of datacenter workloads and are typically deployed on dedicated servers, which is the simplest way to ensure low tail latency across all loads. Unfortunately, it also leads to low energy efficiency and low resource utilization during the frequent periods of medium or low load.
George Prekas, Mia Primorac, Adam Belay, Christoforos E. Kozyrakis, Edouard Bugnion
SoCC2