Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Jessica Taylor
dblp:168/1716
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference › approximate inference › variational inference
amortized inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning Stochastic Inverses · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
bayesian network inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning Stochastic Inverses · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods
markov chain monte carlo |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning Stochastic Inverses · NIPS 2013 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › monte carlo methods › markov chain monte carlo
metropolis-hastings |
0.2 | 1 | 2013 | Learning Stochastic Inverses · NIPS 2013 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
stochastic inverse · 0.2block proposals · 0.2Inverse MCMC · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | A Formal Solution to the Grain of Truth Problem
Jan Leike, Jessica Taylor, Benya Fallenstein |
UAI | 2 |
| 2013 | Learning Stochastic InversesabstractWe describe a class of algorithms for amortized inference in Bayesian networks. In this setting, we invest computation upfront to support rapid online inference for a wide range of queries. Our approach is based on learning an inverse factorization of a model's joint distribution: a factorization that turns observations into root nodes. Our algorithms accumulate information to estimate the local conditional distributions that constitute such a factorization. These stochastic inverses can be used to invert each of the computation steps leading to an observation, sampling backwards in order to quickly find a likely explanation. We show that estimated inverses converge asymptotically in number of (prior or posterior) training samples. To make use of inverses before convergence, we describe the Inverse MCMC algorithm, which uses stochastic inverses to make block proposals for a Metropolis-Hastings sampler. We explore the efficiency of this sampler for a variety of parameter regimes and Bayes nets. Andreas Stuhlmüller, Jessica Taylor, Noah D. Goodman |
NIPS | 2 |