Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Armen Aghajanyan
dblp:168/8426
· DBLP profile ↗
18ranked-venue papers
7as first author
15since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 18 · 7 first-author · 15 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
17 papers |
Language models and text generation · 29% Generative modeling · 24% Deep learning architectures and training · 14% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
3 papers |
Information retrieval · 76% Web and social media mining · 24% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Image and video coding · 100% |
Topics — the 30 heaviest of 46, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Generative modeling
multimodal generation |
1.4 | 2 | 2024 | Jointly Training Large Autoregressive Multimodal Models · ICLR 2024 Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Language Modeling · ICML 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
language model pretraining |
1.2 | 2 | 2023 | D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversification · NeurIPS 2023 HTLM: Hyper-Text Pre-Training and Prompting of Language Models · ICLR 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
1.0 | 2 | 2021 | Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapse · ICLR 2021 Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-Tuning · ACL/IJCNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
autoregressive model |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Worse is Better: Navigating the Compression Generation Trade-off In Visual Tokenization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image generation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Worse is Better: Navigating the Compression Generation Trade-off In Visual Tokenization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
image tokenization |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Worse is Better: Navigating the Compression Generation Trade-off In Visual Tokenization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Image and video coding
image compression |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | When Worse is Better: Navigating the Compression Generation Trade-off In Visual Tokenization · NeurIPS 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
instruction tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Jointly Training Large Autoregressive Multimodal Models · ICLR 2024 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › autoregressive model
multimodal autoregressive generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Jointly Training Large Autoregressive Multimodal Models · ICLR 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › neural language model
autoregressive language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MEGABYTE: Predicting Million-byte Sequences with Multiscale Transformers · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
code generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
data selection |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › data curation
deduplication |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and Diversification · NeurIPS 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
multimodal language model |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Generative Mixed-Modal Language Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › transformer
multi-scale transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MEGABYTE: Predicting Million-byte Sequences with Multiscale Transformers · NeurIPS 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
scaling laws |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Generative Mixed-Modal Language Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › diffusion model
text-to-image generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Language Modeling · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Scaling Laws for Generative Mixed-Modal Language Models · ICML 2023 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
transformer |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | MEGABYTE: Predicting Million-byte Sequences with Multiscale Transformers · NeurIPS 2023 |
Information retrieval
retrieval-augmented generation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Language Modeling · ICML 2023 |
Program synthesis and code generation › code completion
fill-in-the-middle |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis · ICLR 2023 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
large language model training dynamics |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model › knowledge in language models
memorization |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Question answering and dialogue systems
open-domain question answering |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model training
scaling laws for language models |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language Models · NeurIPS 2022 |
Information retrieval › document retrieval
passage retrieval |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Information retrieval
reranking |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question Generation · EMNLP 2022 |
Web and social media mining › web mining
web page structure analysis |
0.6 | 1 | 2022 | HTLM: Hyper-Text Pre-Training and Prompting of Language Models · ICLR 2022 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › pre-training › unsupervised pre-training
contrastive pre-training |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | VideoCLIP: Contrastive Pre-training for Zero-shot Video-Text Understanding · EMNLP (1) 2021 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
fine-tuning |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapse · ICLR 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
scaling laws · 1.7causally regularized tokenization · 1.7pre-training · 1.6fine-tuning · 1.5language model · 1.3generative model · 1.3model fusion · 0.8instruction tuning · 0.8autoregressive modeling · 0.8empirical study · 0.7CM3 Transformer · 0.7CLIP retrieval · 0.7zero-shot question generation · 0.6prompting · 0.6pre-trained language model · 0.6
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | When Worse is Better: Navigating the Compression Generation Trade-off In Visual TokenizationabstractCurrent image generation methods are based on a two-stage training approach. In stage 1, an auto-encoder is trained to compress an image into a latent space; in stage 2, a generative model is trained to learn a distribution over that latent space. This reveals a fundamental trade-off, do we compress more aggressively to make the latent distribution easier for the stage 2 model to learn even if it makes reconstruction worse? We study this problem in the context of discrete, auto-regressive image generation. Through the lens of scaling laws, we show that smaller stage 2 models can benefit from more compressed stage 1 latents even if reconstruction performance worsens, demonstrating that generation modeling capacity plays a role in this trade-off. Diving deeper, we rigorously study the connection between compute scaling and the stage 1 rate-distortion trade-off. Next, we introduce Causally Regularized Tokenization (CRT), which uses knowledge of the stage 2 generation modeling procedure to embed useful inductive biases in stage 1 latents. This regularization improves stage 2 generation performance better by making the tokens easier to model without affecting the stage 1 compression rate and marginally affecting distortion: we are able to improve compute efficiency 2-3$\times$ over baseline. Finally, we use CRT with further optimizations to the visual tokenizer setup to result in a generative pipeline that matches LlamaGen-3B generation performance (2.18 FID) with half the tokens per image (256 vs. 576) and a fourth the total model parameters (775M vs. 3.1B) while using the same architecture and inference procedure. Vivek Ramanujan, Kushal Tirumala, Armen Aghajanyan, Luke Zettlemoyer, Ali Farhadi |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2024 | Jointly Training Large Autoregressive Multimodal ModelsabstractIn recent years, advances in the large-scale pretraining of language and text-to-image models have revolutionized the field of machine learning. Yet, integrating these two modalities into a single, robust model capable of generating seamless multimodal outputs remains a significant challenge. To address this gap, we present the Joint Autoregressive Mixture (JAM) framework, a modular approach that systematically fuses existing text and image generation models. We also introduce a specialized, data-efficient instruction-tuning strategy, tailored for mixed-modal generation tasks. Our final instruct-tuned model demonstrates unparalleled performance in generating high-quality multimodal outputs and represents the first model explicitly designed for this purpose. Emanuele Aiello, Lili Yu, Yixin Nie, Armen Aghajanyan, Barlas Oguz |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2023 | InCoder: A Generative Model for Code Infilling and Synthesis
Daniel Fried, Armen Aghajanyan, Jessy Lin, Sida I. Wang, Eric Wallace, Freda Shi, Ruiqi Zhong, Scott Yih, Luke Zettlemoyer, Mike Lewis |
ICLR | 2 |
| 2023 | Scaling Laws for Generative Mixed-Modal Language ModelsabstractGenerative language models define distributions over sequences of tokens that can represent essentially any combination of data modalities (e.g., any permutation of image tokens from VQ-VAEs, speech tokens from HuBERT, BPE tokens for language or code, and so on). To better understand the scaling properties of such mixed-modal models, we conducted over 250 experiments using seven different modalities and model sizes ranging from 8 million to 30 billion, trained on 5-100 billion tokens. We report new mixed-modal scaling laws that unify the contributions of individual modalities and the interactions between them. Specifically, we explicitly model the optimal synergy and competition due to data and model size as an additive term to previous uni-modal scaling laws. We also find four empirical phenomena observed during the training, such as emergent coordinate-ascent style training that naturally alternates between modalities, guidelines for selecting critical hyper-parameters, and connections between mixed-modal competition and training stability. Finally, we test our scaling law by training a 30B speech-text model, which significantly outperforms the corresponding unimodal models. Overall, our research provides valuable insights into the design and training of mixed-modal generative models, an important new class of unified models that have unique distributional properties. Armen Aghajanyan, Lili Yu, Alexis Conneau, Wei-Ning Hsu, Karen Hambardzumyan, Stephen Roller, Naman Goyal 0001, Omer Levy, Luke Zettlemoyer |
ICML | 1 |
| 2023 | Retrieval-Augmented Multimodal Language ModelingabstractRecent multimodal models such as DALL-E and CM3 have achieved remarkable progress in text-to-image and image-to-text generation. However, these models store all their knowledge (e.g., the appearance of the Eiffel Tower) in the model parameters, requiring increasingly larger models and training data to capture more knowledge. To integrate knowledge in a more scalable and modular way, we propose a retrieval-augmented multimodal model, which enables a base multimodal model (generator) to refer to relevant text and images fetched by a retriever from external memory (e.g., documents on the web). Specifically, for the retriever, we use a pretrained CLIP, and for the generator, we train a CM3 Transformer on the LAION dataset. Our resulting model, named Retrieval-Augmented CM3 (RA-CM3), is the first multimodal model that can retrieve and generate both text and images. We show that RA-CM3 significantly outperforms baseline multimodal models such as DALL-E and CM3 on both image and caption generation tasks (12 FID and 17 CIDEr improvements on MS-COCO), while requiring much less compute for training (<30% of DALL-E). Moreover, we show that RA-CM3 exhibits novel capabilities such as faithful image generation and multimodal in-context learning (e.g., image generation from demonstrations). Michihiro Yasunaga, Armen Aghajanyan, Richard James 0001, Jure Leskovec, Percy Liang, Mike Lewis, Luke Zettlemoyer, Scott Yih |
ICML | 2 |
| 2023 | D4: Improving LLM Pretraining via Document De-Duplication and DiversificationabstractOver recent years, an increasing amount of compute and data has been poured into training large language models (LLMs), usually by doing one-pass learning on as many tokens as possible randomly selected from large-scale web corpora. While training on ever-larger portions of the internet leads to consistent performance improvements, the size of these improvements diminishes with scale, and there has been little work exploring the effect of data selection on pre-training and downstream performance beyond simple de-duplication methods such as MinHash. Here, we show that careful data selection (on top of de-duplicated data) via pre-trained model embeddings can speed up training (20% efficiency gains) and improves average downstream accuracy on 16 NLP tasks (up to 2%) at the 6.7B model scale. Furthermore, we show that repeating data intelligently consistently outperforms baseline training (while repeating random data performs worse than baseline training). Our results indicate that clever data selection can significantly improve LLM pre-training, calls into question the common practice of training for a single epoch on as much data as possible, and demonstrates a path to keep improving our models past the limits of randomly sampling web data. Kushal Tirumala, Daniel Simig, Armen Aghajanyan, Ari S. Morcos |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2023 | MEGABYTE: Predicting Million-byte Sequences with Multiscale TransformersabstractAutoregressive transformers are spectacular models for short sequences but scale poorly to long sequences such as high-resolution images, podcasts, code, or books. We proposed Megabyte, a multi-scale decoder architecture that enables end-to-end differentiable modeling of sequences of over one million bytes. Megabyte segments sequences into patches and uses a local submodel within patches and a global model between patches. This enables sub-quadratic self-attention, much larger feedforward layers for the same compute, and improved parallelism during decoding---unlocking better performance at reduced cost for both training and generation. Extensive experiments show that Megabyte allows byte-level models to perform competitively with subword models on long context language modeling, achieve state-of-the-art density estimation on ImageNet, and model audio from raw files. Together, these results establish the viability of tokenization-free autoregressive sequence modeling at scale. Lili Yu, Daniel Simig, Colin Flaherty, Armen Aghajanyan, Luke Zettlemoyer, Mike Lewis |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2022 | Improving Passage Retrieval with Zero-Shot Question GenerationabstractWe propose a simple and effective re-ranking method for improving passage retrieval in open question answering.The re-ranker re-scores retrieved passages with a zero-shot question generation model, which uses a pre-trained language model to compute the probability of the input question conditioned on a retrieved passage.This approach can be applied on top of any retrieval method (e.g.neural or keywordbased), does not require any domain-or taskspecific training (and therefore is expected to generalize better to data distribution shifts), and provides rich cross-attention between query and passage (i.e. it must explain every token in the question).When evaluated on a number of open-domain retrieval datasets, our re-ranker improves strong unsupervised retrieval models by 6%-18% absolute and strong supervised models by up to 12% in terms of top-20 passage retrieval accuracy.We also obtain new stateof-the-art results on full open-domain question answering by simply adding the new re-ranker to existing models with no further changes.1 Devendra Singh Sachan, Mike Lewis, Mandar Joshi, Armen Aghajanyan, Scott Yih, Joelle Pineau, Luke Zettlemoyer |
EMNLP | 4 |
| 2022 | HTLM: Hyper-Text Pre-Training and Prompting of Language Models
Armen Aghajanyan, Dmytro Okhonko, Mike Lewis, Mandar Joshi, Hu Xu 0001, Gargi Ghosh, Luke Zettlemoyer |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2022 | Memorization Without Overfitting: Analyzing the Training Dynamics of Large Language ModelsabstractDespite their wide adoption, the underlying training and memorization dynamics of very large language models is not well understood. We empirically study exact memorization in causal and masked language modeling, across model sizes and throughout the training process. We measure the effects of dataset size, learning rate, and model size on memorization, finding that larger language models memorize training data faster across all settings. Surprisingly, we show that larger models can memorize a larger portion of the data before over-fitting and tend to forget less throughout the training process. We also analyze the memorization dynamics of different parts of speech and find that models memorize nouns and numbers first; we hypothesize and provide empirical evidence that nouns and numbers act as a unique identifier for memorizing individual training examples. Together, these findings present another piece of the broader puzzle of trying to understand what actually improves as models get bigger. Kushal Tirumala, Aram H. Markosyan, Luke Zettlemoyer, Armen Aghajanyan |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2021 | Intrinsic Dimensionality Explains the Effectiveness of Language Model Fine-TuningabstractArmen Aghajanyan, Sonal Gupta, Luke Zettlemoyer. Proceedings of the 59th Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics and the 11th International Joint Conference on Natural Language Processing (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2021. Armen Aghajanyan, Sonal Gupta, Luke Zettlemoyer |
ACL/IJCNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | Muppet: Massive Multi-task Representations with Pre-FinetuningabstractWe propose pre-finetuning, an additional largescale learning stage between language model pre-training and fine-tuning.Pre-finetuning is massively multi-task learning (around 50 datasets, over 4.8 million total labeled examples), and is designed to encourage learning of representations that generalize better to many different tasks.We show that prefinetuning consistently improves performance for pretrained discriminators (e.g.RoBERTa) and generation models (e.g.BART) on a wide range of tasks (sentence prediction, commonsense reasoning, MRC, etc.), while also significantly improving sample efficiency during fine-tuning.We also show that large-scale multi-tasking is crucial; pre-finetuning can hurt performance when few tasks are used up until a critical point (usually above 15) after which performance improves linearly in the number of tasks. Armen Aghajanyan, Anchit Gupta, Akshat Shrivastava, Xilun Chen 0002, Luke Zettlemoyer, Sonal Gupta |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2021 | VideoCLIP: Contrastive Pre-training for Zero-shot Video-Text UnderstandingabstractHu Xu, Gargi Ghosh, Po-Yao Huang, Dmytro Okhonko, Armen Aghajanyan, Florian Metze, Luke Zettlemoyer, Christoph Feichtenhofer. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing. 2021. Hu Xu 0001, Gargi Ghosh, Po-Yao Huang 0001, Dmytro Okhonko, Armen Aghajanyan, Florian Metze, Luke Zettlemoyer, Christoph Feichtenhofer |
EMNLP (1) | 5 |
| 2021 | Better Fine-Tuning by Reducing Representational Collapse
Armen Aghajanyan, Akshat Shrivastava, Anchit Gupta, Naman Goyal 0001, Luke Zettlemoyer, Sonal Gupta |
ICLR | 1 |
| 2021 | Non-Autoregressive Semantic Parsing for Compositional Task-Oriented DialogabstractArun Babu, Akshat Shrivastava, Armen Aghajanyan, Ahmed Aly, Angela Fan, Marjan Ghazvininejad. Proceedings of the 2021 Conference of the North American Chapter of the Association for Computational Linguistics: Human Language Technologies. 2021. Arun Babu, Akshat Shrivastava, Armen Aghajanyan, Ahmed Aly, Angela Fan, Marjan Ghazvininejad |
NAACL-HLT | 3 |
| 2020 | Conversational Semantic ParsingabstractArmen Aghajanyan, Jean Maillard, Akshat Shrivastava, Keith Diedrick, Michael Haeger, Haoran Li, Yashar Mehdad, Veselin Stoyanov, Anuj Kumar, Mike Lewis, Sonal Gupta. Proceedings of the 2020 Conference on Empirical Methods in Natural Language Processing (EMNLP). 2020. Armen Aghajanyan, Jean Maillard, Akshat Shrivastava, Keith Diedrick, Michael Haeger, Haoran Li 0007, Yashar Mehdad, Veselin Stoyanov, Mike Lewis, Sonal Gupta |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | Pre-training via ParaphrasingabstractWe introduce MARGE, a pre-trained sequence-to-sequence model learned with an unsupervised multi-lingual multi-document paraphrasing objective. MARGE provides an alternative to the dominant masked language modeling paradigm, where we self-supervise the \emph{reconstruction} of target text by \emph{retrieving} a set of related texts (in many languages) and conditioning on them to maximize the likelihood of generating the original. We show it is possible to jointly learn to do retrieval and reconstruction, given only a random initialization. The objective noisily captures aspects of paraphrase, translation, multi-document summarization, and information retrieval, allowing for strong zero-shot performance on several tasks. For example, with no additional task-specific training we achieve BLEU scores of up to 35.8 for document translation. We further show that fine-tuning gives strong performance on a range of discriminative and generative tasks in many languages, making MARGE the most generally applicable pre-training method to date. Mike Lewis, Marjan Ghazvininejad, Gargi Ghosh, Armen Aghajanyan, Sida I. Wang, Luke Zettlemoyer |
NeurIPS | 4 |
| 2019 | Towards Language Agnostic Universal RepresentationsabstractWhen a bilingual student learns to solve word problems in math, we expect the student to be able to solve these problem in both languages the student is fluent in, even if the math lessons were only taught in one language.However, current representations in machine learning are language dependent.In this work, we present a method to decouple the language from the problem by learning language agnostic representations and therefore allowing training a model in one language and applying to a different one in a zero shot fashion.We learn these representations by taking inspiration from linguistics, specifically the Universal Grammar hypothesis and learn universal latent representations that are language agnostic (Chomsky, 2014;Montague, 1970).We demonstrate the capabilities of these representations by showing that models trained on a single language using language agnostic representations achieve very similar accuracies in other languages. * Work done while at Microsoft. Armen Aghajanyan, Saurabh Tiwary |
ACL (1) | 1 |