Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew Peekema

dblp:169/1615 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Legged, aerial and field robots · 56% Motion planning and robot control · 44%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
bipedal robot
0.212015
Exciting Engineered Passive Dynamics in a Bipedal Robot · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › locomotion control
dynamic gait control
0.212015
Exciting Engineered Passive Dynamics in a Bipedal Robot · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots
passive dynamics
0.112015
Exciting Engineered Passive Dynamics in a Bipedal Robot · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spring-mass model · 0.2dynamics-based control · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Exciting Engineered Passive Dynamics in a Bipedal Robot
abstract
A common approach in designing legged robots is to build fully actuated machines and control the machine dynamics entirely in software, carefully avoiding impacts and expending a lot of energy. However, these machines are outperformed by their human and animal counterparts. Animals achieve their impressive agility, efficiency, and robustness through a close integration of passive dynamics, implemented through mechanical components, and neural control. Robots can benefit from this same integrated approach, but a strong theoretical framework is required to design the passive dynamics of a machine and exploit them for control. For this framework, we use a bipedal spring-mass model, which has been shown to approximate the dynamics of human locomotion. This paper reports the first implementation of spring-mass walking on a bipedal robot. We present the use of template dynamics as a control objective exploiting the engineered passive spring-mass dynamics of the ATRIAS robot. The results highlight the benefits of combining passive dynamics with dynamics-based control and open up a library of spring-mass model-based control strategies for dynamic gait control of robots.
Daniel Renjewski, Alexander Badri-Spröwitz, Andrew Peekema, Mikhail S. Jones, Jonathan W. Hurst
IEEE Trans. Robotics3