Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Greg Coppola
dblp:169/3207
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Information extraction and text analysis · 100% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › statistical parsing
joint tagging and parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Transition-Based Parsing and Tagging with Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › sequence labeling
part-of-speech tagging |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Transition-Based Parsing and Tagging with Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
syntactic parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Transition-Based Parsing and Tagging with Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis › syntactic parsing › dependency parsing
transition-based dependency parsing |
0.2 | 1 | 2015 | Improved Transition-Based Parsing and Tagging with Neural Networks · EMNLP 2015 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
structured training · 0.2set-valued features · 0.2neural network · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2015 | Improved Transition-Based Parsing and Tagging with Neural NetworksabstractWe extend and improve upon recent work in structured training for neural network transition-based dependency parsing.We do this by experimenting with novel features, additional transition systems and by testing on a wider array of languages.In particular, we introduce set-valued features to encode the predicted morphological properties and part-ofspeech confusion sets of the words being parsed.We also investigate the use of joint parsing and partof-speech tagging in the neural paradigm.Finally, we conduct a multi-lingual evaluation that demonstrates the robustness of the overall structured neural approach, as well as the benefits of the extensions proposed in this work.Our research further demonstrates the breadth of the applicability of neural network methods to dependency parsing, as well as the ease with which new features can be added to neural parsing models. Christopher Alberti, David Weiss 0001, Greg Coppola, Slav Petrov |
EMNLP | 3 |