Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Yinhu Wang

dblp:169/5608 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
6ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2026
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Systems, architecture and hardware · 5 · 3 since 2021Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 3 · 3 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
4 papers
Storage systems · 69% Cloud and datacenter computing · 24% Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures · 6%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Machine learning and data management · 100%

Topics — the 10 heaviest of 12, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Storage systems › storage architecture › block storage
cloud block storage
1.622025
Evolving the Cloud Block Store with Performance, Elasticity, Availability, and Hardware Offloading · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
What's the Story in EBS Glory: Evolutions and Lessons in Building Cloud Block Store · FAST 2024
Storage systems › i/o optimization
i/o prefetching
1.012026
How Soon is Now? Preloading Images for Virtual Disks with ThinkAhead · FAST 2026
Storage systems › storage architecture › block storage
virtual disks
1.012026
How Soon is Now? Preloading Images for Virtual Disks with ThinkAhead · FAST 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing › cloud storage
elastic block storage
0.912025
Evolving the Cloud Block Store with Performance, Elasticity, Availability, and Hardware Offloading · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
Storage systems
storage reliability
0.722025
Minority Disk Failure Prediction Based on Transfer Learning in Large Data Centers of Heterogeneous Disk Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Evolving the Cloud Block Store with Performance, Elasticity, Availability, and Hardware Offloading · ACM Trans. Storage 2025
Storage systems › storage reliability
disk failure prediction
0.412020
Minority Disk Failure Prediction Based on Transfer Learning in Large Data Centers of Heterogeneous Disk Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Hardware accelerators and domain-specific architectures
transfer learning
0.412020
Minority Disk Failure Prediction Based on Transfer Learning in Large Data Centers of Heterogeneous Disk Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020
Cloud and datacenter computing
virtualization
0.312026
How Soon is Now? Preloading Images for Virtual Disks with ThinkAhead · FAST 2026
Cloud and datacenter computing
cloud storage
0.212024
What's the Story in EBS Glory: Evolutions and Lessons in Building Cloud Block Store · FAST 2024
Machine learning and data management
transfer learning
0.112020
Minority Disk Failure Prediction Based on Transfer Learning in Large Data Centers of Heterogeneous Disk Systems · IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst. 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative and quantitative analysis · 0.9production experience · 0.9transfer learning · 0.9SMART attributes · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2026 How Soon is Now? Preloading Images for Virtual Disks with ThinkAhead
Xinqi Chen, Erci Xu, Changhong Wang 0005, Jifei Yi, Qiuping Wang, Shizhuo Sun, Junping Wu, Hailin Peng, Yinhu Wang, Jiaji Zhu, Jiesheng Wu, Guangtao Xue, Patrick P. C. Lee
FAST13
2025 Evolving the Cloud Block Store with Performance, Elasticity, Availability, and Hardware Offloading
abstract
In this paper, we qualitatively and quantitatively discuss the design choices, production experience, and lessons in building the Elastic Block Storage ( EBS ) at Alibaba Cloud over the past decade. To cope with hardware advancement and users’ demands, we shift our focus from design simplicity in EBS1 to high performance and space efficiency in EBS2 , and finally reducing network traffic amplification in EBS3 . In addition to the architectural evolutions, we also summarize development lessons and experiences as four topics, including: (i) achieving high elasticity in latency, throughput, IOPS, and capacity; (ii) improving availability by minimizing the blast radius of individual, regional, and global failure events; (iii) identifying the motivations and key tradeoffs in various hardware offloading solutions; and (iv) identifying the pros/cons of alternative solutions and explaining why seemingly promising ideas would not work in practice.
Erci Xu, Weidong Zhang 0011, Qiuping Wang, Yuesheng Gu, Zhenwei Lu, Tao Ouyang, Guanqun Dong, Wenwen Peng, Yilei Peng, Tianyun Wang, Wenyuan Yan, Wenhui Yao, Zhongjie Wu, Lingjun Zhu, Yinhu Wang, Junping Wu, Jiaji Zhu, Jiesheng Wu
ACM Trans. Storage23
2024 What's the Story in EBS Glory: Evolutions and Lessons in Building Cloud Block Store
Weidong Zhang 0011, Erci Xu, Qiuping Wang, Yuesheng Gu, Zhenwei Lu, Tao Ouyang, Guanqun Dai, Wenwen Peng, Yilei Peng, Tianyun Wang, Wenyuan Yan, Wenhui Yao, Zhongjie Wu, Lingjun Zhu, Yinhu Wang, Junping Wu, Jiaji Zhu, Jiesheng Wu
FAST23
2024 Efficient post-earthquake reconnaissance planning using adaptive batch-mode active learning
Amirhossein Cheraghi, Yinhu Wang, Nikola Markovic, Ge Ou
Adv. Eng. Informatics2
2020 Minority Disk Failure Prediction Based on Transfer Learning in Large Data Centers of Heterogeneous Disk Systems
abstract
The storage system in large scale data centers is typically built upon thousands or even millions of disks, where disk failures constantly happen. A disk failure could lead to serious data loss and thus system unavailability or even catastrophic consequences if the lost data cannot be recovered. While replication and erasure coding techniques have been widely deployed to guarantee storage availability and reliability, disk failure prediction is gaining popularity as it has the potential to prevent disk failures from occurring in the first place. Recent trends have turned toward applying machine learning approaches based on disk SMART attributes for disk failure predictions. However, traditional machine learning (ML) approaches require a large set of training data in order to deliver good predictive performance. In large-scale storage systems, new disks enter gradually to augment the storage capacity or to replace failed disks, leading storage systems to consist of small amounts of new disks from different vendors and/or different models from the same vendor as time goes on. We refer to this relatively small amount of disks as minority disks. Due to the lack of sufficient training data, traditional ML approaches fail to deliver satisfactory predictive performance in evolving storage systems which consist of heterogeneous minority disks. To address this challenge and improve the predictive performance for minority disks in large data centers, we propose a minority disk failure prediction model named TLDFP based on a transfer learning approach. Our evaluation results in two realistic datasets have demonstrated that TLDFP can deliver much more precise results and lower additional maintenance cost, compared to four popular prediction models based on traditional ML algorithms and two state-of-the-art transfer learning methods.
Ji Zhang 0010, Ke Zhou 0001, Ping Huang 0001, Xubin He, Yong-guang Ji, Yinhu Wang
IEEE Trans. Parallel Distributed Syst.8
2019 Transfer Learning based Failure Prediction for Minority Disks in Large Data Centers of Heterogeneous Disk Systems
abstract
The storage system in large scale data centers is typically built upon thousands or even millions of disks, where disk failures constantly happen. A disk failure could lead to serious data loss and thus system unavailability or even catastrophic consequences if the lost data cannot be recovered. While replication and erasure coding techniques have been widely deployed to guarantee storage availability and reliability, disk failure prediction is gaining popularity as it has the potential to prevent disk failures from occurring in the first place. Recent trends have turned toward applying machine learning approaches based on disk SMART attributes for disk failure predictions. However, traditional machine learning (ML) approaches require a large set of training data in order to deliver good predictive performance. In large-scale storage systems, new disks enter gradually to augment the storage capacity or to replace failed disks, leading storage systems to consist of small amounts of new disks from different vendors and/or different models from the same vendor as time goes on. We refer to this relatively small amount of disks as minority disks. Due to the lack of sufficient training data, traditional ML approaches fail to deliver satisfactory predictive performance in evolving storage systems which consist of heterogeneous minority disks. To address this challenge and improve the predictive performance for minority disks in large data centers, we propose a minority disk failure prediction model named TLDFP based on a transfer learning approach. Our evaluation results on two realistic datasets have demonstrated that TLDFP can deliver much more precise results, compared to four popular prediction models based on traditional ML algorithms and two state-of-the-art transfer learning methods.
Ji Zhang 0010, Ke Zhou 0001, Ping Huang 0001, Xubin He, Zhili Xiao, Yong-guang Ji, Yinhu Wang
ICPP8