Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Mikko Sallinen

dblp:17/181 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2012
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
Motion planning and robot control · 50% Robot manipulation · 50%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot planning
sensing planning
0.112006
Planning of Sensory Feedback in Industrial Robot Workcells · ICRA 2006

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

a posteriori error covariance matrix · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2012 Home network semantic modeling and reasoning - A case study
Topi Pulkkinen, Mikko Sallinen, Jiyeon Son, Jun-Hee Park, Yann-Hang Lee
FUSION2
2006 Planning of Sensory Feedback in Industrial Robot Workcells
abstract
In this paper, we present a method for planning the sensing features when the geometrical representation of the target object is known. The presented method is a synthesis form and can be used in several measurement applications in robotics. Sensing planning is an important issue when the measurement data is sparse, includes a lot of noise or there are tight time-requirements. The criteria for selecting the measurement locations and orientations is a posteriori error covariance matrix of the parameters to be estimated. The presented approach is verified by simulation tests in the case of work object location. The proposed method has been implemented into a commercial ConiferRob-robot software
Mikko Sallinen, Tapio Heikkilä, Matti Sirviö
ICRA1
2000 Flexible hand-eye calibration for multi-camera systems
abstract
Calibration of coordinate systems between cameras and robots, i.e. hand-eye-calibration, is of key importance in sensor based robotics. We present a method which is based on using a very simple, conic calibration object, and results in fast and simple calculations. It originates from the pose estimation algorithms and contributes to earlier methods robustness for the location of the calibration object and simplicity from the point of view of image processing. Our method is also based on the Bayesian model, thus it also provides estimates for the spatial uncertainties, in the form of covariances of the pose parameters. The algorithm has been tested by simulations and practical experiments.
Tapio Heikkilä, Mikko Sallinen, Toshio Matsushita, Fumiaki Tomita
IROS2
2000 Sensor fusion with spatial uncertainties in a holonic multirobot workcell
abstract
A holonic multi-robot cell is a cell specifying a system based on autonomous and cooperative units called holons. This paper presents a method using Bayesian estimation to model uncertainties in a multi-robot cell. Using sensor fusion with several robots and combining all the information together gives new possibilities for planning the sensing operations, e.g. to minimize the size of locating measurements. If the robots and work object are accurately modelled (noise model and surface forms), an iterative planner can be used to plan a minimal task sequence for the treatment of the work object. Further analysis of the remaining uncertainties is based on observing the direction of the eigenvectors and the respective eigenvalues of the error covariance matrix.
Mikko Sallinen, Tapio Heikkilä, Mika Rintala
SMC1