Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brigitte Kröll

dblp:17/2539 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 1995
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Databases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorTheory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Distributed and cloud data management · 50% Query processing and optimization · 25% Spatial and temporal data management · 25%

Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Distributed and cloud data management
distributed data structures
0.011994
Distributing a Search Tree Among a Growing Number of Processors · SIGMOD Conference 1994
Spatial and temporal data management › spatial query processing
nearest neighbor query
0.011994
Distributing a Search Tree Among a Growing Number of Processors · SIGMOD Conference 1994
Query processing and optimization
range query
0.011994
Distributing a Search Tree Among a Growing Number of Processors · SIGMOD Conference 1994
Distributed and cloud data management › distributed data structures
scalable distributed data structure
0.011994
Distributing a Search Tree Among a Growing Number of Processors · SIGMOD Conference 1994
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1995 Balanced Distributed Search Trees Do Not Exist
Brigitte Kröll, Peter Widmayer
WADS1
1994 Distributing a Search Tree Among a Growing Number of Processors
abstract
Databases are growing steadily, and distributed computer systems are more and more easily available. This provides an opportunity to satisfy the increasingly tighter efficiency requirements by means of distributed data structures. The design and analysis of these structures under efficiency aspects, however, has not yet been studied sufficiently. To our knowledge, a single scalable, distributed data structure has been proposed so far. It is a distributed variant of linear hashing with uncontrolled splits, and, as a consequence, performs efficiently for data distributions that are close to uniform, but not necessarily for others. In addition, it does not support queries that refer to the linear order of keys, such as nearest neighbor or range queries. We propose a distributed search tree that avoids these problems, since it inherits desirable properties from non-distributed trees. Our experiments show that our structure does indeed combine a guarantee for good storage space utilization with high query efficiency. Nevertheless, we feel that further research in the area of scalable, distributed data structures is dearly needed; it should eventually lead to a body of knowledge that is comparable with the non-distributed, classical data structures field.
Brigitte Kröll, Peter Widmayer
SIGMOD Conference1