Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Craig Becker

dblp:17/2600 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 1997
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 65% Robot navigation and mapping · 35%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning
motion planning under uncertainty
0.011997
Motion strategies for maintaining visibility of a moving target · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › motion planning › geometric motion planning
visibility-based planning
0.011997
Motion strategies for maintaining visibility of a moving target · ICRA 1997
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping › localization
landmark-based localization
0.011995
Design of the Optimal Arrangement of Artificial Landmarke · ICRA 1995
Robotics › Robot navigation and mapping
mobile robot navigation
0.011997
Motion strategies for maintaining visibility of a moving target · ICRA 1997
Algorithmic game theory and mechanism design › pricing
spatial competition
0.011995
Design of the Optimal Arrangement of Artificial Landmarke · ICRA 1995

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

spatial competition algorithm · 0.0simulation · 0.0optimal control · 0.0online algorithm · 0.0
YearPublicationVenuePosition
1997 Motion strategies for maintaining visibility of a moving target
abstract
We introduce the problem of computing robot motion strategies that maintain visibility of a moving target in a cluttered workspace. Both motion constraints (as considered in standard motion planning) and visibility constraints (as considered in visual tracking) must be satisfied. Additional criteria, such as the total distance traveled, can be optimized. The general problem is divided into two categories, on the basis of whether the target is predictable. For the predictable case, an algorithm that computes optimal, numerical solutions is presented. For the more challenging case of a partially-predictable target, two online algorithms are presented that each attempt to maintain future visibility with limited prediction. One strategy maximizes the probability that the target will remain in view in a subsequent time step, and the other maximizes the minimum time in which the target could escape the visibility region. We additionally discuss issues resulting from our implementation and experiments on a mobile robot system.
Steven M. LaValle, Héctor H. González-Baños, Craig Becker, Jean-Claude Latombe
ICRA3
1995 Design of the Optimal Arrangement of Artificial Landmarke
abstract
It is important to set landmarks when a robot needs to navigate in a certain environment and to measure its own location; however, it has not been discussed well how to arrange landmarks in the optimal way until now. We, therefore, demonstrate the possibility of design of the optimal arrangement of artificial landmarks. First, we make it clear the optimization problem with regard to the arrangement of landmarks. Second, as one example of the artificial landmarks, we introduce a signboard system. Third, we propose a methodology to evaluate arrangement of landmarks assuming an obstacled rectangular environment. Fourth, we apply the algorithm of spatial competition to the optimal arrangement of landmarks. Finally, simulation results indicate that even though our method is not global optimization approach we can obtain closely optimal and practical arrangement with the minimum number of landmarks which satisfies the necessary condition.
Craig Becker, Joaquín Salas, Kentaro Tokusei, Jean-Claude Latombe
ICRA1