Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

G. Thomann

dblp:17/7734 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Accessibility and assistive technology · 77% Design research and methods · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Accessibility and assistive technology › prosthetics
upper limb prosthetics
0.112009
Development of a prosthetic arm: Experimental validation with the user and an adapted software · ICRA 2009
Design research and methods
user-centered design
0.012009
Development of a prosthetic arm: Experimental validation with the user and an adapted software · ICRA 2009

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user-centered design · 0.1myoelectric control · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2009 Development of a prosthetic arm: Experimental validation with the user and an adapted software
abstract
In the world of upper limb prostheses, few companies propose different kinds of hand, wrist and elbow prostheses but their control is often difficult to understand by the patients. We have decided to develop new myoelectric prosthetic arm (elbow, wrist and hand) by axing our development on the use of new technologies and user centered design methodology. In this paper, we are explaining the different kinds of prostheses currently manufactured their advantages and their drawbacks. Then, we explain our designing choices of the prosthesis and the movements it can realize. We detail the control chosen to simplify the use and the instrument of the product by the patient. In the last part, an adapted software is developed and used to validate experimentally the practice by the patient.
V. Artigue, G. Thomann
ICRA2