Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
G. Thomann
dblp:17/7734
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2009
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Systems, architecture and hardware · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Accessibility and assistive technology · 77% Design research and methods · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Accessibility and assistive technology › prosthetics
upper limb prosthetics |
0.1 | 1 | 2009 | Development of a prosthetic arm: Experimental validation with the user and an adapted software · ICRA 2009 |
Design research and methods
user-centered design |
0.0 | 1 | 2009 | Development of a prosthetic arm: Experimental validation with the user and an adapted software · ICRA 2009 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user-centered design · 0.1myoelectric control · 0.1
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2009 | Development of a prosthetic arm: Experimental validation with the user and an adapted softwareabstractIn the world of upper limb prostheses, few companies propose different kinds of hand, wrist and elbow prostheses but their control is often difficult to understand by the patients. We have decided to develop new myoelectric prosthetic arm (elbow, wrist and hand) by axing our development on the use of new technologies and user centered design methodology. In this paper, we are explaining the different kinds of prostheses currently manufactured their advantages and their drawbacks. Then, we explain our designing choices of the prosthesis and the movements it can realize. We detail the control chosen to simplify the use and the instrument of the product by the patient. In the last part, an adapted software is developed and used to validate experimentally the practice by the patient. V. Artigue, G. Thomann |
ICRA | 2 |