Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Samantha Gillette

dblp:17/9307 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2011
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
computer-mediated communication
0.112011
Contact stratification and deception: blackberry messenger versus SMS use among students · CSCW 2011
Collaborative and social computing
computer-supported cooperative work
0.112011
Contact stratification and deception: blackberry messenger versus SMS use among students · CSCW 2011
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
deception
0.112011
Contact stratification and deception: blackberry messenger versus SMS use among students · CSCW 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey study · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2011 Contact stratification and deception: blackberry messenger versus SMS use among students
abstract
The proliferation of communication technology has led to potential stratification of contacts across different media, which has important implications for interpersonal dynamics, such as deception. The present study examines how two text-based communication media, BBM and SMS, involve different kinds of social contact networks, and how these differences lead to changes in the frequency and nature of lies. The results reveal that BBM social contacts are relationally closer and include more friends but fewer family and acquaintances than SMS. More deception was also observed in BBM, which included more lies about managing social interactions. The results have important implications for the impact of design features, such as PIN exchange, in text messaging.
Lindsay Reynolds, Samantha Gillette, Jason Marder, Zachary Miles, Pavel Vodenski, Ariella Weintraub, Jeremy P. Birnholtz, Jeffrey T. Hancock
CSCW2