Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Jocelyn Ng

dblp:170/1709 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Visualization and visual analytics · 100%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Energy systems and smart grids · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Visualization and visual analytics
design study
0.212016
Matches, Mismatches, and Methods: Multiple-View Workflows for Energy Portfolio Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
Visualization and visual analytics
time series visualization
0.212016
Matches, Mismatches, and Methods: Multiple-View Workflows for Energy Portfolio Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016
Energy systems and smart grids › building energy
building energy analysis
0.112016
Matches, Mismatches, and Methods: Multiple-View Workflows for Energy Portfolio Analysis · IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

work domain analysis · 0.5visual encoding design · 0.5
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Matches, Mismatches, and Methods: Multiple-View Workflows for Energy Portfolio Analysis
abstract
The energy performance of large building portfolios is challenging to analyze and monitor, as current analysis tools are not scalable or they present derived and aggregated data at too coarse of a level. We conducted a visualization design study, beginning with a thorough work domain analysis and a characterization of data and task abstractions. We describe generalizable visual encoding design choices for time-oriented data framed in terms of matches and mismatches, as well as considerations for workflow design. Our designs address several research questions pertaining to scalability, view coordination, and the inappropriateness of line charts for derived and aggregated data due to a combination of data semantics and domain convention. We also present guidelines relating to familiarity and trust, as well as methodological considerations for visualization design studies. Our designs were adopted by our collaborators and incorporated into the design of an energy analysis software application that will be deployed to tens of thousands of energy workers in their client base.
Matthew Brehmer, Jocelyn Ng, Kevin Tate, Tamara Munzner
IEEE Trans. Vis. Comput. Graph.2