Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sebastian Dziadzio
dblp:170/6288
· DBLP profile ↗
6ranked-venue papers
2as first author
5since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 6 · 2 first-author · 5 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 3 · 1 first-author · 3 since 2021Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 33% Language models and text generation · 18% Learning paradigms · 16% | |
| Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper |
Visual content generation and editing · 100% |
Topics — the 9 heaviest of 11, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
model merging |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | How to Merge Your Multimodal Models Over Time? · CVPR 2025 |
Machine learning › Learning paradigms
continual learning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Practitioner's Guide to Real-World Continual Multimodal Pretraining · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
parameter-efficient fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | A Practitioner's Guide to Real-World Continual Multimodal Pretraining · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › Face, body and person analysis
human pose estimation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Full-Body Motion from a Single Head-Mounted Device: Generating SMPL Poses from Partial Observations · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
synthetic training data |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Fake it till you make it: face analysis in the wild using synthetic data alone · ICCV 2021 |
Visual content generation and editing
avatar generation |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Full-Body Motion from a Single Head-Mounted Device: Generating SMPL Poses from Partial Observations · ICCV 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
foundation model |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | How to Merge Your Multimodal Models Over Time? · CVPR 2025 |
Computer vision › Vision and language › vision-language model
multimodal large language model |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | A Practitioner's Guide to Real-World Continual Multimodal Pretraining · NeurIPS 2024 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › 3d shape analysis › 3d face analysis
3d face model |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | Fake it till you make it: face analysis in the wild using synthetic data alone · ICCV 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
model merging · 1.6variational autoencoder · 1.0fine-tuning · 0.9benchmarking · 0.9meta-learning-rate schedules · 0.8procedural generation · 0.5domain adaptation · 0.5
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | ONEBench to Test Them All: Sample-Level Benchmarking Over Open-Ended CapabilitiesabstractAdhiraj Ghosh, Sebastian Dziadzio, Ameya Prabhu, Vishaal Udandarao, Samuel Albanie, Matthias Bethge. Proceedings of the 63rd Annual Meeting of the Association for Computational Linguistics (Volume 1: Long Papers). 2025. Adhiraj Ghosh, Sebastian Dziadzio, Ameya Prabhu, Vishaal Udandarao, Samuel Albanie, Matthias Bethge |
ACL (1) | 2 |
| 2025 | How to Merge Your Multimodal Models Over Time?abstractModel merging combines multiple "expert" models— finetuned from a base foundation model on diverse tasks and domains—into a single, more capable model. However, most existing model merging approaches assume that all experts are available simultaneously. In reality, new tasks and domains emerge progressively over time, requiring strategies to integrate the knowledge of expert models as they become available: a process we call temporal model merging. The temporal dimension introduces unique challenges not addressed in prior work, raising new questions such as: when training for a new task, should the expert model start from the merged past experts or from the original base model? Should we merge all models at each time step? Which merging techniques are best suited for temporal merging? Should different strategies be used to initialize the training and deploy the model? To answer these questions, we propose a unified framework called TIME—Temporal Integration of Model Expertise—which defines temporal model merging across three axes: (1) Initialization Phase, (2) Deployment Phase, and (3) Merging Technique. Using TIME, we study temporal model merging across model sizes, compute budgets, and learning horizons on the FoMo-in-Flux benchmark. Our comprehensive suite of experiments across TIME allows us to uncover key insights for temporal model merging, offering a better understanding of current challenges and best practices for effective temporal model merging. Our code is available here. Sebastian Dziadzio, Vishaal Udandarao, Karsten Roth, Ameya Prabhu, Zeynep Akata, Samuel Albanie, Matthias Bethge |
CVPR | 1 |
| 2024 | A Practitioner's Guide to Real-World Continual Multimodal PretrainingabstractMultimodal foundation models serve numerous applications at the intersection of vision and language. Still, despite being pretrained on extensive data, they become outdated over time.To keep models updated, research into continual pretraining mainly explores scenarios with either (1) infrequent, indiscriminate updates on large-scale new data, or (2) frequent, sample-level updates.However, practical model deployment often operates in the gap between these two limit cases, as real-world applications demand adaptation to specific subdomains, tasks or concepts --- spread over the entire, varying life cycle of a model. In this work, we complement current perspectives on continual pretraining through a research test bed and offer comprehensive guidance for effective continual model updates in such scenarios.We first introduce FoMo-in-Flux, a continual multimodal pretraining benchmark with realistic compute constraints and practical deployment requirements, constructed over 63 datasets with diverse visual and semantic coverage.Using FoMo-in-Flux, we explore the complex landscape of practical continual pretraining through multiple perspectives: (1) data mixtures and stream orderings that emulate real-world deployment settings, (2) methods ranging from simple fine-tuning and traditional continual learning strategies to parameter-efficient updates and model merging, (3) meta-learning-rate schedules and mechanistic design choices, and (4) model and compute scaling. Together, our insights provide a practitioner's guide to continual multimodal pretraining for real-world deployment. Benchmark and code is provided here: https://github.com/ExplainableML/fomoinflux. Vishaal Udandarao, Karsten Roth, Sebastian Dziadzio, Ameya Prabhu, Mehdi Cherti, Oriol Vinyals, Olivier J. Hénaff, Samuel Albanie, Zeynep Akata, Matthias Bethge |
NeurIPS | 3 |
| 2021 | Full-Body Motion from a Single Head-Mounted Device: Generating SMPL Poses from Partial ObservationsabstractThe increased availability and maturity of head-mounted and wearable devices opens up opportunities for remote communication and collaboration. However, the signal streams provided by these devices (e.g., head pose, hand pose, and gaze direction) do not represent a whole person. One of the main open problems is therefore how to leverage these signals to build faithful representations of the user. In this paper, we propose a method based on variational autoencoders to generate articulated poses of a human skeleton based on noisy streams of head and hand pose. Our approach relies on a model of pose likelihood that is novel and theoretically well-grounded. We demonstrate on publicly available datasets that our method is effective even from very impoverished signals and investigate how pose prediction can be made more accurate and realistic. Andrea Dittadi, Sebastian Dziadzio, Darren Cosker, Ben Lundell, Thomas J. Cashman 0001, Jamie Shotton |
ICCV | 2 |
| 2021 | Fake it till you make it: face analysis in the wild using synthetic data aloneabstractWe demonstrate that it is possible to perform face-related computer vision in the wild using synthetic data alone. The community has long enjoyed the benefits of synthesizing training data with graphics, but the domain gap between real and synthetic data has remained a problem, especially for human faces. Researchers have tried to bridge this gap with data mixing, domain adaptation, and domain-adversarial training, but we show that it is possible to synthesize data with minimal domain gap, so that models trained on synthetic data generalize to real in-the-wild datasets. We describe how to combine a procedurally-generated parametric 3D face model with a comprehensive library of hand-crafted assets to render training images with unprecedented realism and diversity. We train machine learning systems for face-related tasks such as landmark localization and face parsing, showing that synthetic data can both match real data in accuracy as well as open up new approaches where manual labeling would be impossible. Erroll Wood, Tadas Baltrusaitis, Charlie Hewitt, Sebastian Dziadzio, Thomas J. Cashman 0001, Jamie Shotton |
ICCV | 4 |
| 2015 | Comparison of language models trained on written texts and speech transcripts in the context of automatic speech recognitionabstractWe investigate whether language models used in automatic speech recognition (ASR) should be trained on speech transcripts rather than on written texts.By calculating log-likelihood statistic for part-of-speech (POS) n-grams, we show that there are significant differences between written texts and speech transcripts.We also test the performance of language models trained on speech transcripts and written texts in ASR and show that using the former results in greater word error reduction rates (WERR), even if the model is trained on much smaller corpora.For our experiments we used the manually labeled one million subcorpus of the National Corpus of Polish and an HTK acoustic model. Sebastian Dziadzio, Aleksandra Nabozny, Aleksander Smywinski-Pohl, Bartosz Ziólko |
FedCSIS | 1 |