Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maadh Al Kalbani

dblp:170/7238 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
3as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3 · 2 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Immersive interaction · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Immersive interaction › 3d object manipulation
virtual grasping
0.212016
Analysis of Medium Wrap Freehand Virtual Object Grasping in Exocentric Mixed Reality · ISMAR 2016
Immersive interaction
mixed reality interaction
0.112016
Analysis of Medium Wrap Freehand Virtual Object Grasping in Exocentric Mixed Reality · ISMAR 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

statistical analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Inclusive Augmented and Virtual Reality: A Research Agenda
abstract
Augmented and virtual reality experiences present significant barriers for disabled people, making it challenging to fully engage with immersive platforms. Whilst researchers have started to explore potential solutions addressing these accessibility issues, we currently lack a comprehensive understanding of research areas requiring further investigation to support the development of inclusive AR/VR systems. To address current gaps in knowledge, we led a series of multidisciplinary sandpits with relevant stakeholders (i.e., academic researchers, industry specialists, people with lived experience of disability, assistive technologists, and representatives from disability organisations, charities, and special needs educational institutions) to collaboratively explore research challenges, opportunities, and solutions. Based on insights shared by participants, we present a research agenda identifying key areas where further work is required in relation to specific forms of disability (i.e., across the spectrum of physical, visual, cognitive, and hearing impairments), including wider considerations associated with the development of more accessible immersive platforms.
Chris Creed, Maadh Al Kalbani, Arthur Theil, Sayan Sarcar, Ian Williams 0001
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Interact.2
2017 Freehand grasping in mixed reality: analysing variation during transition phase of interaction
abstract
This paper presents an assessment of the variability in freehand grasping of virtual objects in an exocentric mixed reality environment. We report on an experiment covering 480 grasp based motions in the transition phase of interaction to determine the level of variation to the grasp aperture. Controlled laboratory conditions were used where 30 right-handed participants were instructed to grasp and move an object (cube or sphere) using a single medium wrap grasp from a starting location (A) to a target location (B) in a controlled manner. We present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the results showing the variation in grasp change during this phase of interaction. In conclusion we detail recommendations for freehand virtual object interaction design notably that considerations should be given to the change in grasp aperture over the transition phase of interaction.
Maadh Al Kalbani, Maite Frutos-Pascual, Ian Williams 0001
ICMI1
2016 Analysis of Medium Wrap Freehand Virtual Object Grasping in Exocentric Mixed Reality
abstract
This article presents an analysis into the accuracy and problems of freehand grasping in exocentric Mixed Reality (MR). We report on two experiments (1710 grasps) which quantify the influence different virtual object shape, size and position has on the most common physical grasp, a medium wrap. We propose two methods for grasp measurement, namely, the Grasp Aperture (GAp) and Grasp Displacement (GDisp). Controlled laboratory conditions are used where 30 right-handed participants attempt to recreate a medium wrap grasp. We present a comprehensive statistical analysis of the results giving pairwise comparisons of all conditions under test. The results illustrate that user Grasp Aperture varies less than expected in comparison to the variation of virtual object size, with common aperture sizes found. Regarding the position of the virtual object, depth estimation is often mismatched due to under judgement of the z position and x, y displacement has common patterns. Results from this work can be applied to aid in the development of freehand grasping and considered as the first study into accuracy of freehand grasping in MR, provide a starting point for future interaction design.
Maadh Al Kalbani, Ian Williams 0001, Maite Frutos-Pascual
ISMAR1
2016 Improving freehand placement for grasping virtual objects via dual view visual feedback in mixed reality
abstract
This paper presents a first study into the use of dual view visual feedback in an exocentric MR environment for assisting freehand grasping of virtual objects. Recent work has highlighted problems associated with user errors in freehand grasping, via an analysis of virtual object type, location and size. Our work presents an extension to this, where 30 participants are recruited for two experiments (one assessing object size and the second object position), giving 1710 grasps in total. We report on results following the same protocol of the aforementioned study using a dual view visual feedback method. Results show that dual view visual feedback significantly increases user z placement accuracy and improves grasp placement in the x and y axes, however completion time is significantly higher. No improvement was found in user grasp aperture using dual view visual feedback for changes in object size and position.
Maadh Al Kalbani, Ian Williams 0001, Maite Frutos-Pascual
VRST1