Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kevin Merckx

dblp:170/8936 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Interaction techniques and input · 87% Ubiquitous computing and smart environments · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Interaction techniques and input
gesture input
0.212015
Natural User Interface for Ambient Objects · ISMAR 2015
Interaction techniques and input › target selection
pointing
0.212015
Natural User Interface for Ambient Objects · ISMAR 2015
Ubiquitous computing and smart environments › ambient intelligence
ambient interaction
0.112015
Natural User Interface for Ambient Objects · ISMAR 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

calibration · 0.2RGB-D sensing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Natural User Interface for Ambient Objects
abstract
To help the computing device always understand the spacial relationship between the user's gesture and the ambient objects, a methodology is proposed to find the user's virtual eye center in the wearable camera coordinate system and then calculate accurately where a user is pointing at to perform the natural interaction. First, the wearable RGB-D sensor is affixed around the user forehead. A tool-free calibration is done by having the user move their fingers along their lines of sight from his eye center to the random selected targets. The fingertips are detected in the depth camera and then the interaction of these lines of sight is calculated. Then we present how to find where the user is pointing at in different scenarios with a depth map, a detected object and a controlled virtual element. To validate our methods, we perform a point-to-screen experiment. Results demonstrate that when a user is interacting with a display up to 1.5 meters away, our natural gesture interface has an average error of 2.1cm. In conclusion, the presented technique is a viable option for a reliable user interaction.
Kevin Merckx, Pascal Fallavollita, Nassir Navab
ISMAR2