Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Raphaela Gehle

dblp:171/5745 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
5ranked-venue papers
3as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 5 · 3 first-authorArtificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 2 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 87% Collaborative and social computing · 13%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction › service robot
museum guide robot
0.312017
How to Open an Interaction Between Robot and Museum Visitor?: Strategies to Establish a Focused Encounter in HRI · HRI 2017
Human-robot interaction › social robot
social robot behavior
0.312017
How to Open an Interaction Between Robot and Museum Visitor?: Strategies to Establish a Focused Encounter in HRI · HRI 2017
Collaborative and social computing › museum experience
museum visitor engagement
0.112017
How to Open an Interaction Between Robot and Museum Visitor?: Strategies to Establish a Focused Encounter in HRI · HRI 2017

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

wizard-of-oz · 0.3video corpus analysis · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Interactional Dynamics in User Groups: Answering a Robot's Question in Adult-Child Constellations
abstract
The paper explores the interactional dynamics within groups of visitors (children & adults) who are interacting with an autonomous museum guide robot. Using the example of question-answer sequences, analysis reveals that 'answering' tends to be a process of interactional negotiation at the end of which a 'result' is addressed to the robot. This process, however, is often not transparent to the robot and considered solely as "silence" which leads to the disregard of the users' attempts to provide an answer.
Karola Pitsch, Raphaela Gehle, Timo Dankert, Sebastian Wrede 0001
HAI2
2017 How to Open an Interaction Between Robot and Museum Visitor?: Strategies to Establish a Focused Encounter in HRI
abstract
On the basis of a video corpus of human-robot-interaction in a museum guide scenario, we address the challenge how a robot could determine the appropriate moment of opening an interaction with a visitor. Considering such "openings" as a stepwise coordinated process, we used a wizard-of-oz setup to investigate the wizard's timely decisions about when to look at the visitor resp. to verbally greet him/her (during early stages called "pre-beginnings"). Analysis is based on both robot internal and external data and combines qualitative sequential case analysis and quantification. Analysis reveals features for classification of two visitors types and corresponding opening strategies.
Raphaela Gehle, Karola Pitsch, Timo Dankert, Sebastian Wrede 0001
HRI1
2016 Referential practices. Effects of a museum guide robot suggesting a deictic 'repair' action to visitors attempting to orient to an exhibit
abstract
An autonomous robot system was equipped with basic means to monitor the users' success/failure in following a robot's verbal-gestural deictic reference to an object and - in case of problems - to provide additional help, i.e. to suggest a `repair' action. A real-world field trial with the robot acting as museum guide constitutes the basis for analysis of the users' reactions to the first reference and the subsequent `repair' action in two structurally different conditions. Results indicate that deictic `repair' actions are mostly successful helping users to correctly orient, but they may also lead to confusion for initially correctly oriented visitors in situations of small groups of users. A recurring user practice is revealed which consists of displaying to co-visitors their understanding of the reference by pointing to the location and thus providing additional orientational help.
Karola Pitsch, Timo Dankert, Raphaela Gehle, Sebastian Wrede 0001
RO-MAN3
2015 Trouble-based group dynamics in real-world HRI - Reactions on unexpected next moves of a museum guide robot
abstract
On the basis of a videocorpus of human-robot-interactions in a museum guide scenario and with a combined approach of qualitative case analysis and quantitative evaluation we examine two research questions: (1) What type of group dynamics result from a robot's unexpected next move - especially focussing on gaze patterns? (2) What should a robot detect when searching for trouble events and how should it identify patterns of visitor behavior that are related to the robots actions? Systematically studying opening sequences, we extract structural gaze patterns out of two cases considered from an interactional linguistics perspective as well as keeping in mind a system's capabilities of perception.
Raphaela Gehle, Karola Pitsch, Timo Dankert, Sebastian Wrede 0001
RO-MAN1
2014 Signaling trouble in robot-to-group interaction.emerging visitor dynamics with a museum guide robot
abstract
Once a museum guide robot is deployed in the real world, it is faced with the difficulty to deal with user utterances within a noisy environment. We present explorative analysis of the ways in which visitors signal trouble on a multimodal level when they have difficulties in understanding the robot. Such moments of trouble are investigated in the context of robot-to-group situations. Analysis will give insights into the visitors conduct at moments of trouble in robot-to-single-user and robot-to-group interactions. In a limited data set, we found that members of a group show internal gaze coordination between each other when trouble occurs due to the robot's inadequate behavior. Implications will be drawn for further developing the interactional capabilities of an autonomous robot system to be attentive and responsive to the users' needs.
Raphaela Gehle, Karola Pitsch, Sebastian Wrede 0001
HAI1