Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Zhiyuan Yu 0004
dblp:172/4550-4
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0009-0009-3035-3839ORCID · conflict
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Efficient and distributed learning · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › efficient training
backpropagation efficiency |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sheared Backpropagation for Fine-Tuning Foundation Models · CVPR 2024 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › memory-efficient training
memory-efficient fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Sheared Backpropagation for Fine-Tuning Foundation Models · CVPR 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
sparsified backpropagation · 0.8bandit methods · 0.8activation pruning · 0.8CUDA kernel · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Sheared Backpropagation for Fine-Tuning Foundation ModelsabstractFine-tuning is the process of extending the training of pre-trained models on specific target tasks, thereby significantly enhancing their performance across various applications. However, fine-tuning often demands large memory consumption, posing a challenge for low-memory devices that some previous memory-efficient fine-tuning methods attempted to mitigate by pruning activations for gradient computation, albeit at the cost of significant computational overhead from the pruning processes during training. To address these challenges, we introduce PreBackRazor; a novel activation pruning scheme offering both computational and memory efficiency through a sparsified back-propagation strategy, which judiciously avoids unnecessary activation pruning and storage and gradient computation. Before activation pruning, our approach samples a probability of selecting a portion of parameters to freeze, utilizing a bandit method for updates to prioritize impactful gradients on convergence. During the feed-forward pass, each model layer adjusts adaptively based on parameter activation status, obviating the need for sparsification and storage of redundant activations for subsequent backpropagation. Benchmarking on fine-tuning foundation models, our approach maintains baseline accuracy across diverse tasks, yielding over 20% speedup and around 10% memory reduction. Moreover, integrating with an advanced CUDA kernel achieves up to 60% speedup without extra memory costs or accuracy loss, significantly enhancing the efficiency of fine-tuning foundation models on memory-constrained devices. Zhiyuan Yu 0004, Li Shen 0008, Liang Ding 0006, Xinmei Tian 0001, Yixin Chen 0001, Dacheng Tao |
CVPR | 1 |