Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

David Gadot

dblp:173/5169 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
1 paper
3D vision · 33% Representation and self-supervised learning · 33% Image recognition and object detection · 33%
Computer graphics and multimedia
1 paper
Image and video processing · 50% Multimedia analysis and retrieval · 50%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 7, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
metric learning
0.312017
Optical Flow Requires Multiple Strategies (but Only One Network) · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › Image recognition and object detection
negative sample mining
0.312017
Optical Flow Requires Multiple Strategies (but Only One Network) · CVPR 2017
Computer vision › 3D vision › motion estimation
optical flow
0.312017
Optical Flow Requires Multiple Strategies (but Only One Network) · CVPR 2017
Multimedia analysis and retrieval › multimedia feature representation
local image descriptor learning
0.212016
PatchBatch: A Batch Augmented Loss for Optical Flow · CVPR 2016
Image and video processing › motion estimation
optical flow
0.212016
PatchBatch: A Batch Augmented Loss for Optical Flow · CVPR 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

metric learning · 0.3deep neural network · 0.3siamese convolutional network · 0.2flow interpolation · 0.2batch augmented loss · 0.2approximate nearest neighbor matching · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Optical Flow Requires Multiple Strategies (but Only One Network)
abstract
We show that the matching problem that underlies optical flow requires multiple strategies, depending on the amount of image motion and other factors. We then study the implications of this observation on training a deep neural network for representing image patches in the context of descriptor based optical flow. We propose a metric learning method, which selects suitable negative samples based on the nature of the true match. This type of training produces a network that displays multiple strategies depending on the input and leads to state of the art results on the KITTI 2012 and KITTI 2015 optical flow benchmarks.
Tal Schuster, Lior Wolf, David Gadot
CVPR3
2016 PatchBatch: A Batch Augmented Loss for Optical Flow
abstract
We propose a new pipeline for optical flow computation, based on Deep Learning techniques. We suggest using a Siamese CNN to independently, and in parallel, compute the descriptors of both images. The learned descriptors are then compared efficiently using the L2 norm and do not require network processing of patch pairs. The success of the method is based on an innovative loss function that computes higher moments of the loss distributions for each training batch. Combined with an Approximate Nearest Neighbor patch matching method and a flow interpolation technique, state of the art performance is obtained on the most challenging and competitive optical flow benchmarks.
David Gadot, Lior Wolf
CVPR1