Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bongsuk Ko

dblp:174/2008 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2015
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Debugging and program repair · 87% Software maintenance and evolution · 13%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Debugging and program repair
fault localization
0.212015
Mutation-Based Fault Localization for Real-World Multilingual Programs (T) · ASE 2015
Debugging and program repair › fault localization
mutation-based fault localization
0.212015
Mutation-Based Fault Localization for Real-World Multilingual Programs (T) · ASE 2015

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mutation operators · 0.2mutation analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2015 Mutation-Based Fault Localization for Real-World Multilingual Programs (T)
abstract
Programmers maintain and evolve their software in a variety of programming languages to take advantage of various control/data abstractions and legacy libraries. The programming language ecosystem has diversified over the last few decades, and non-trivial programs are likely to be written in more than a single language. Unfortunately, language interfaces such as Java Native Interface and Python/C are difficult to use correctly and the scope of fault localization goes beyond language boundaries, which makes debugging multilingual bugs challenging. To overcome the aforementioned limitations, we propose a mutation-based fault localization technique for real-world multilingual programs. To improve the accuracy of locating multilingual bugs, we have developed and applied new mutation operators as well as conventional mutation operators. The results of the empirical evaluation for six non-trivial real-world multilingual bugs are promising in that the proposed technique identifies the buggy statements as the most suspicious statements for all six bugs.
Shin Hong, Byeongcheol Lee, Taehoon Kwak, Yiru Jeon, Bongsuk Ko, Moonzoo Kim
ASE5