Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Alex D. Wade
dblp:175/4808
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-9366-1507ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Information retrieval · 77% Knowledge graphs · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search › entity retrieval
entity ranking |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking Challenge · WSDM 2016 |
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
academic knowledge graph |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking Challenge · WSDM 2016 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking ChallengeabstractIn this paper, we describe the WSDM Cup entity ranking challenge held in conjunction with the 2016 Web Search and Data Mining conference (WSDM 2016). Participants in the challenge were provided access to the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG), a large heterogeneous graph of academic entities, and were invited to calculate the query-independent importance of each publication in the graph. Submissions for the challenge were open from August through November 2015, and a public leaderboard displayed teams? progress against a set of training judgements. Final evaluations were performed against a separate, withheld portion of the evaluation judgements. The top eight performing teams were then invited to submit papers to the WSDM Cup workshop, held at the WSDM 2016 conference. Alex D. Wade, Kuansan Wang, Yizhou Sun, Antonio Gulli |
WSDM | 1 |
| 2010 | Word add-in for ontology recognition: semantic enrichment of scientific literatureabstractBACKGROUND: In the current era of scientific research, efficient communication of information is paramount. As such, the nature of scholarly and scientific communication is changing; cyberinfrastructure is now absolutely necessary and new media are allowing information and knowledge to be more interactive and immediate. One approach to making knowledge more accessible is the addition of machine-readable semantic data to scholarly articles. RESULTS: The Word add-in presented here will assist authors in this effort by automatically recognizing and highlighting words or phrases that are likely information-rich, allowing authors to associate semantic data with those words or phrases, and to embed that data in the document as XML. The add-in and source code are publicly available at http://www.codeplex.com/UCSDBioLit. CONCLUSIONS: The Word add-in for ontology term recognition makes it possible for an author to add semantic data to a document as it is being written and it encodes these data using XML tags that are effectively a standard in life sciences literature. Allowing authors to mark-up their own work will help increase the amount and quality of machine-readable literature metadata. J. Lynn Fink, Pablo Fernicola, Rahul Chandran, Savas Parastatidis, Alex D. Wade, Oscar Naim, Greg B. Quinn, Philip E. Bourne |
BMC Bioinform. | 5 |