Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Alex D. Wade

dblp:175/4808 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-9366-1507ORCID · verified

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1 · 1 first-authorApplied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Information retrieval · 77% Knowledge graphs · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Information retrieval › search engines › semantic search › entity retrieval
entity ranking
0.212016
WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking Challenge · WSDM 2016
Knowledge graphs › domain-specific knowledge graph
academic knowledge graph
0.112016
WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking Challenge · WSDM 2016
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 WSDM Cup 2016: Entity Ranking Challenge
abstract
In this paper, we describe the WSDM Cup entity ranking challenge held in conjunction with the 2016 Web Search and Data Mining conference (WSDM 2016). Participants in the challenge were provided access to the Microsoft Academic Graph (MAG), a large heterogeneous graph of academic entities, and were invited to calculate the query-independent importance of each publication in the graph. Submissions for the challenge were open from August through November 2015, and a public leaderboard displayed teams? progress against a set of training judgements. Final evaluations were performed against a separate, withheld portion of the evaluation judgements. The top eight performing teams were then invited to submit papers to the WSDM Cup workshop, held at the WSDM 2016 conference.
Alex D. Wade, Kuansan Wang, Yizhou Sun, Antonio Gulli
WSDM1
2010 Word add-in for ontology recognition: semantic enrichment of scientific literature
abstract
BACKGROUND: In the current era of scientific research, efficient communication of information is paramount. As such, the nature of scholarly and scientific communication is changing; cyberinfrastructure is now absolutely necessary and new media are allowing information and knowledge to be more interactive and immediate. One approach to making knowledge more accessible is the addition of machine-readable semantic data to scholarly articles. RESULTS: The Word add-in presented here will assist authors in this effort by automatically recognizing and highlighting words or phrases that are likely information-rich, allowing authors to associate semantic data with those words or phrases, and to embed that data in the document as XML. The add-in and source code are publicly available at http://www.codeplex.com/UCSDBioLit. CONCLUSIONS: The Word add-in for ontology term recognition makes it possible for an author to add semantic data to a document as it is being written and it encodes these data using XML tags that are effectively a standard in life sciences literature. Allowing authors to mark-up their own work will help increase the amount and quality of machine-readable literature metadata.
J. Lynn Fink, Pablo Fernicola, Rahul Chandran, Savas Parastatidis, Alex D. Wade, Oscar Naim, Greg B. Quinn, Philip E. Bourne
BMC Bioinform.5