Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Steven Wengrovitz

dblp:176/4101 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
impression management
0.212016
What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook · CSCW 2016
Collaborative and social computing
social media
0.212016
What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook · CSCW 2016
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social media interaction
0.112016
What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook · CSCW 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

survey · 0.2behavioral data analysis · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook
abstract
What social value do Likes on Facebook hold? This research examines people's attitudes and behaviors related to receiving one-click feedback in social media. Likes and other kinds of lightweight affirmation serve as social cues of acceptance and maintain interpersonal relationships, but may mean different things to different people. Through surveys and de-identified, aggregated behavioral Facebook data, we find that in general, people care more about who Likes their posts than how many Likes they receive, desiring feedback most from close friends, romantic partners, and family members other than their parents. While most people do not feel strongly that receiving “enough” Likes is important, roughly two-thirds of posters regularly receive more than “enough.” We also note a “Like paradox,” a phenomenon in which people's friends receive more Likes because their friends have more friends to provide those Likes. Individuals with lower levels of self-esteem and higher levels of self-monitoring are more likely to think that Likes are important and to feel bad if they do not receive “enough” Likes. The results inform product design and our understanding of how lightweight interactions shape our experiences online.
Lauren E. Scissors, Moira Burke, Steven Wengrovitz
CSCW3