Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Steven Wengrovitz
dblp:176/4101
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › computer-mediated communication
impression management |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook · CSCW 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing
social media |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook · CSCW 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing › social media
social media interaction |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on Facebook · CSCW 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
survey · 0.2behavioral data analysis · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | What¿s in a Like? Attitudes and behaviors around receiving Likes on FacebookabstractWhat social value do Likes on Facebook hold? This research examines people's attitudes and behaviors related to receiving one-click feedback in social media. Likes and other kinds of lightweight affirmation serve as social cues of acceptance and maintain interpersonal relationships, but may mean different things to different people. Through surveys and de-identified, aggregated behavioral Facebook data, we find that in general, people care more about who Likes their posts than how many Likes they receive, desiring feedback most from close friends, romantic partners, and family members other than their parents. While most people do not feel strongly that receiving “enough” Likes is important, roughly two-thirds of posters regularly receive more than “enough.” We also note a “Like paradox,” a phenomenon in which people's friends receive more Likes because their friends have more friends to provide those Likes. Individuals with lower levels of self-esteem and higher levels of self-monitoring are more likely to think that Likes are important and to feel bad if they do not receive “enough” Likes. The results inform product design and our understanding of how lightweight interactions shape our experiences online. Lauren E. Scissors, Moira Burke, Steven Wengrovitz |
CSCW | 3 |