Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Erica L. Goodman

dblp:176/4174 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · unresolved

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 77% Health and well-being technologies · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing
online communities
0.212016
Quantifying and Predicting Mental Illness Severity in Online Pro-Eating Disorder Communities · CSCW 2016
Health and well-being technologies › mental health
eating disorders
0.112016
Quantifying and Predicting Mental Illness Severity in Online Pro-Eating Disorder Communities · CSCW 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

topic modeling · 0.2statistical modeling · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Quantifying and Predicting Mental Illness Severity in Online Pro-Eating Disorder Communities
abstract
Social media sites have struggled with the presence of emotional and physical self-injury content. Individuals who share such content are often challenged with severe mental illnesses like eating disorders. We present the first study quantifying levels of mental illness severity (MIS) in social media. We examine a set of users on Instagram who post content on pro-eating disorder tags (26M posts from 100K users). Our novel statistical methodology combines topic modeling and novice/clinician annotations to infer MIS in a user's content. Alarmingly, we find that proportion of users whose content expresses high MIS have been on the rise since 2012 (13%/year increase). Previous MIS in a user's content over seven months can predict future risk with 81% accuracy. Our model can also forecast MIS levels up to eight months in the future with performance better than baseline. We discuss the health outcomes and design implications as well as ethical considerations of this line of research.
Stevie Chancellor, Zhiyuan Jerry Lin, Erica L. Goodman, Stephanie Zerwas, Munmun De Choudhury
CSCW3