Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kostantinos Georgiadis

dblp:176/5047 · also Kostas Georgiadis · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-9116-4729ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 3Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1 · 1 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Usability and user experience research · 50% Wearable and physiological sensing · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Empirical software engineering · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Wearable and physiological sensing
brain-computer interface
0.312018
Towards an affordable brain computer interface for the assessment of programmers' mental workload · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2018
Usability and user experience research › cognitive load
cognitive load assessment
0.312018
Towards an affordable brain computer interface for the assessment of programmers' mental workload · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2018
Empirical software engineering › human factors in software engineering
developer cognition
0.112018
Towards an affordable brain computer interface for the assessment of programmers' mental workload · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

brain-computer interface · 0.7
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 A Computer Vision System Supporting Blind People - The Supermarket Case
Kostantinos Georgiadis, Fotis Kalaganis, Panagiotis Migkotzidis, Elisavet Chatzilari, Spiros Nikolopoulos, Ioannis Kompatsiaris
ICVS1
2018 Towards an affordable brain computer interface for the assessment of programmers' mental workload
Makrina Viola Kosti, Kostantinos Georgiadis, Dimitrios A. Adamos, Nikolaos A. Laskaris, Diomidis Spinellis, Lefteris Angelis
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.2
2017 An Error Aware SSVEP-based BCI
abstract
Error-Related Potentials (ErrPs) have been used lately in order to improve several existing Brain-Computer Interface (BCI) applications. In our study we investigate the contribution of ErrPs in a Steady State Visual Evoked Potential (SSVEP) based BCI. An extensive study is presented in order to discover the limitations of the proposed scheme. Using Common Spatial Patterns and Random Forests we manage to show encouraging results regarding the incorporation of ErrPs in a SSVEP system. Finally, we provide a novel methodology (Inverse Correct Response Time) that can measure the gain of a BCI system by incorporating ErrPs in terms of time efficiency.
Fotis Kalaganis, Elisavet Chatzilari, Kostantinos Georgiadis, Spiros Nikolopoulos, Nikolaos A. Laskaris, Ioannis Kompatsiaris
CBMS3
2017 A Comparison Study on EEG Signal Processing Techniques Using Motor Imagery EEG Data
abstract
Brain-computer interfaces (BCIs) have been gaining momentum in making human-computer interaction more natural, especially for people with neuro-muscular disabilities. Among the existing solutions the systems relying on electroencephalograms (EEG) occupy the most prominent place due to their non-invasiveness. In this work, we provide a review of various existing techniques for the identification of motor imagery (MI) tasks. More specifically, we perform a comparison between Common Spatial Patterns (CSP) related features and features based on Power Spectral Density (PSD) techniques. Furthermore, for the identification of MI tasks, two well-known classifiers are used, the Linear Discriminant Analysis (LDA) and the Support Vector Machines (SVM). Our results confirm that PSD features demonstrate the most consistent robustness and effectiveness in extracting patterns for accurately discriminating between left and right MI tasks.
Vangelis P. Oikonomou, Kostantinos Georgiadis, Georgios Liaros, Spiros Nikolopoulos, Ioannis Kompatsiaris
CBMS2