Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Lifu Tu

dblp:176/5280 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
5 papers
Language models and text generation · 38% Machine translation · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 15%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Program synthesis and code generation · 100%
Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper
Knowledge graphs · 100%

Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
constrained text generation
0.812024
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation
0.812024
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
toxicity reduction
0.812024
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models
0.712023
CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis · ICLR 2023
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model
0.412020
An Exploration of Arbitrary-Order Sequence Labeling via Energy-Based Inference Networks · EMNLP (1) 2020
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
non-autoregressive machine translation
0.412020
ENGINE: Energy-Based Inference Networks for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation · ACL 2020
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling
0.412020
An Exploration of Arbitrary-Order Sequence Labeling via Energy-Based Inference Networks · EMNLP (1) 2020
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference
0.312018
Learning Approximate Inference Networks for Structured Prediction · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
inference network
0.312018
Learning Approximate Inference Networks for Structured Prediction · ICLR (Poster) 2018
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
factoid question answering
0.212024
Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
code language models
0.212023
CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis · ICLR 2023

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

large language model · 1.3large language model decoding · 0.8future constraint satisfaction estimation · 0.8self-attention network · 0.4recurrent network · 0.4knowledge distillation · 0.4inference network · 0.4energy-based model · 0.4convolutional network · 0.4approximate inference network · 0.3neural network · 0.2bilinear model · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2024 Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding
abstract
Large Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation.However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models.Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest.While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention.In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions.The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process.Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keywordconstrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023). 1
Lifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Caiming Xiong, Yingbo Zhou 0002
EMNLP1
2023 CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis
Erik Nijkamp, Bo Pang 0004, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu, Huan Wang 0016, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong
ICLR4
2020 ENGINE: Energy-Based Inference Networks for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation
abstract
We propose to train a non-autoregressive machine translation model to minimize the energy defined by a pretrained autoregressive model.In particular, we view our non-autoregressive translation system as an inference network (Tu and Gimpel, 2018) trained to minimize the autoregressive teacher energy.This contrasts with the popular approach of training a non-autoregressive model on a distilled corpus consisting of the beam-searched outputs of such a teacher model.Our approach, which we call ENGINE (ENerGy-based Inference NEtworks), achieves state-of-the-art non-autoregressive results on the IWSLT 2014 DE-EN and WMT 2016 RO-EN datasets, approaching the performance of autoregressive models.
Lifu Tu, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Sam Wiseman, Kevin Gimpel
ACL1
2020 An Exploration of Arbitrary-Order Sequence Labeling via Energy-Based Inference Networks
abstract
Many tasks in natural language processing involve predicting structured outputs, e.g., sequence labeling, semantic role labeling, parsing, and machine translation.Researchers are increasingly applying deep representation learning to these problems, but the structured component of these approaches is usually quite simplistic.In this work, we propose several high-order energy terms to capture complex dependencies among labels in sequence labeling, including several that consider the entire label sequence.We use neural parameterizations for these energy terms, drawing from convolutional, recurrent, and selfattention networks.We use the framework of learning energy-based inference networks (Tu and Gimpel, 2018) for dealing with the difficulties of training and inference with such models.We empirically demonstrate that this approach achieves substantial improvement using a variety of high-order energy terms on four sequence labeling tasks, while having the same decoding speed as simple, local classifiers.We also find high-order energies to help in noisy data conditions. 1
Lifu Tu, Tianyu Liu 0001, Kevin Gimpel
EMNLP (1)1
2020 An Empirical Study on Robustness to Spurious Correlations using Pre-trained Language Models
abstract
Recent work has shown that pre-trained language models such as BERT improve robustness to spurious correlations in the dataset. Intrigued by these results, we find that the key to their success is generalization from a small amount of counterexamples where the spurious correlations do not hold. When such minority examples are scarce, pre-trained models perform as poorly as models trained from scratch. In the case of extreme minority, we propose to use multi-task learning (MTL) to improve generalization. Our experiments on natural language inference and paraphrase identification show that MTL with the right auxiliary tasks significantly improves performance on challenging examples without hurting the in-distribution performance. Further, we show that the gain from MTL mainly comes from improved generalization from the minority examples. Our results highlight the importance of data diversity for overcoming spurious correlations. 1
Lifu Tu, Garima Lalwani, Spandana Gella, He He 0001
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics1
2018 Learning Approximate Inference Networks for Structured Prediction
Lifu Tu, Kevin Gimpel
ICLR (Poster)1
2016 Commonsense Knowledge Base Completion
abstract
We enrich a curated resource of commonsense knowledge by formulating the problem as one of knowledge base completion (KBC). Most work in KBC focuses on knowledge bases like Freebase that relate entities drawn from a fixed set. However, the tuples in ConceptNet (Speer and Havasi, 2012) define relations between an unbounded set of phrases. We develop neural network models for scoring tuples on arbitrary phrases and evaluate them by their ability to distinguish true held-out tuples from false ones. We find strong performance from a bilinear model using a simple additive architecture to model phrases. We manually evaluate our trained model’s ability to assign quality scores to novel tuples, finding that it can propose tuples at the same quality level as mediumconfidence tuples from ConceptNet.
Xiang Li 0069, Aynaz Taheri, Lifu Tu, Kevin Gimpel
ACL (1)3