Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Lifu Tu
dblp:176/5280
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
5as first author
2since 2021 · last 2024
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 5 first-author · 2 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 38% Machine translation · 17% Trustworthy machine learning · 15% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper |
Program synthesis and code generation · 100% | |
| Databases, data mining, and information retrieval
1 paper |
Knowledge graphs · 100% |
Topics — the 11 heaviest of 14, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › text generation
constrained text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
controllable text generation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
toxicity reduction |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Program synthesis and code generation
code generation with language models |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis · ICLR 2023 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling
energy-based model |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Exploration of Arbitrary-Order Sequence Labeling via Energy-Based Inference Networks · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Machine translation › neural machine translation
non-autoregressive machine translation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | ENGINE: Energy-Based Inference Networks for Non-Autoregressive Machine Translation · ACL 2020 |
Natural language and speech › Information extraction and text analysis
sequence labeling |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | An Exploration of Arbitrary-Order Sequence Labeling via Energy-Based Inference Networks · EMNLP (1) 2020 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning › probabilistic inference
approximate inference |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Approximate Inference Networks for Structured Prediction · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Probabilistic and Bayesian machine learning
inference network |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | Learning Approximate Inference Networks for Structured Prediction · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › natural language understanding › question answering
factoid question answering |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models Decoding · EMNLP 2024 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
code language models |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis · ICLR 2023 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
large language model · 1.3large language model decoding · 0.8future constraint satisfaction estimation · 0.8self-attention network · 0.4recurrent network · 0.4knowledge distillation · 0.4inference network · 0.4energy-based model · 0.4convolutional network · 0.4approximate inference network · 0.3neural network · 0.2bilinear model · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Unlocking Anticipatory Text Generation: A Constrained Approach for Large Language Models DecodingabstractLarge Language Models (LLMs) have demonstrated a powerful ability for text generation.However, achieving optimal results with a given prompt or instruction can be challenging, especially for billion-sized models.Additionally, undesired behaviors such as toxicity or hallucinations can manifest.While much larger models (e.g., ChatGPT) may demonstrate strength in mitigating these issues, there is still no guarantee of complete prevention.In this work, we propose formalizing text generation as a future-constrained generation problem to minimize undesirable behaviors and enforce faithfulness to instructions.The estimation of future constraint satisfaction, accomplished using LLMs, guides the text generation process.Our extensive experiments demonstrate the effectiveness of the proposed approach across three distinct text generation tasks: keywordconstrained generation (Lin et al., 2020), toxicity reduction (Gehman et al., 2020), and factual correctness in question-answering (Gao et al., 2023). 1 Lifu Tu, Semih Yavuz, Jin Qu, Jiacheng Xu 0001, Caiming Xiong, Yingbo Zhou 0002 |
EMNLP | 1 |
| 2023 | CodeGen: An Open Large Language Model for Code with Multi-Turn Program Synthesis
Erik Nijkamp, Bo Pang 0004, Hiroaki Hayashi, Lifu Tu, Huan Wang 0016, Yingbo Zhou 0002, Silvio Savarese, Caiming Xiong |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2020 | ENGINE: Energy-Based Inference Networks for Non-Autoregressive Machine TranslationabstractWe propose to train a non-autoregressive machine translation model to minimize the energy defined by a pretrained autoregressive model.In particular, we view our non-autoregressive translation system as an inference network (Tu and Gimpel, 2018) trained to minimize the autoregressive teacher energy.This contrasts with the popular approach of training a non-autoregressive model on a distilled corpus consisting of the beam-searched outputs of such a teacher model.Our approach, which we call ENGINE (ENerGy-based Inference NEtworks), achieves state-of-the-art non-autoregressive results on the IWSLT 2014 DE-EN and WMT 2016 RO-EN datasets, approaching the performance of autoregressive models. Lifu Tu, Richard Yuanzhe Pang, Sam Wiseman, Kevin Gimpel |
ACL | 1 |
| 2020 | An Exploration of Arbitrary-Order Sequence Labeling via Energy-Based Inference NetworksabstractMany tasks in natural language processing involve predicting structured outputs, e.g., sequence labeling, semantic role labeling, parsing, and machine translation.Researchers are increasingly applying deep representation learning to these problems, but the structured component of these approaches is usually quite simplistic.In this work, we propose several high-order energy terms to capture complex dependencies among labels in sequence labeling, including several that consider the entire label sequence.We use neural parameterizations for these energy terms, drawing from convolutional, recurrent, and selfattention networks.We use the framework of learning energy-based inference networks (Tu and Gimpel, 2018) for dealing with the difficulties of training and inference with such models.We empirically demonstrate that this approach achieves substantial improvement using a variety of high-order energy terms on four sequence labeling tasks, while having the same decoding speed as simple, local classifiers.We also find high-order energies to help in noisy data conditions. 1 Lifu Tu, Tianyu Liu 0001, Kevin Gimpel |
EMNLP (1) | 1 |
| 2020 | An Empirical Study on Robustness to Spurious Correlations using Pre-trained Language ModelsabstractRecent work has shown that pre-trained language models such as BERT improve robustness to spurious correlations in the dataset. Intrigued by these results, we find that the key to their success is generalization from a small amount of counterexamples where the spurious correlations do not hold. When such minority examples are scarce, pre-trained models perform as poorly as models trained from scratch. In the case of extreme minority, we propose to use multi-task learning (MTL) to improve generalization. Our experiments on natural language inference and paraphrase identification show that MTL with the right auxiliary tasks significantly improves performance on challenging examples without hurting the in-distribution performance. Further, we show that the gain from MTL mainly comes from improved generalization from the minority examples. Our results highlight the importance of data diversity for overcoming spurious correlations. 1 Lifu Tu, Garima Lalwani, Spandana Gella, He He 0001 |
Trans. Assoc. Comput. Linguistics | 1 |
| 2018 | Learning Approximate Inference Networks for Structured Prediction
Lifu Tu, Kevin Gimpel |
ICLR (Poster) | 1 |
| 2016 | Commonsense Knowledge Base CompletionabstractWe enrich a curated resource of commonsense knowledge by formulating the problem as one of knowledge base completion (KBC). Most work in KBC focuses on knowledge bases like Freebase that relate entities drawn from a fixed set. However, the tuples in ConceptNet (Speer and Havasi, 2012) define relations between an unbounded set of phrases. We develop neural network models for scoring tuples on arbitrary phrases and evaluate them by their ability to distinguish true held-out tuples from false ones. We find strong performance from a bilinear model using a simple additive architecture to model phrases. We manually evaluate our trained model’s ability to assign quality scores to novel tuples, finding that it can propose tuples at the same quality level as mediumconfidence tuples from ConceptNet. Xiang Li 0069, Aynaz Taheri, Lifu Tu, Kevin Gimpel |
ACL (1) | 3 |