Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Marie-Karelle Riviere
dblp:176/9969
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 100% | |
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper |
Medical and health informatics · 100% |
Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
multi-armed bandit |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding Trials · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
thompson sampling |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding Trials · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Medical and health informatics › drug development › clinical trial
clinical trial design |
0.1 | 1 | 2021 | On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding Trials · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2021 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
thompson sampling · 1.0finite-time regret bounds · 1.0
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | On Multi-Armed Bandit Designs for Dose-Finding TrialsabstractWe study the problem of finding the optimal dosage in early stage clinical trials through the multi-armed bandit lens. We advocate the use of the Thompson Sampling principle, a flexible algorithm that can accommodate different types of monotonicity assumptions on the toxicity and efficacy of the doses. For the simplest version of Thompson Sampling, based on a uniform prior distribution for each dose, we provide finite-time upper bounds on the number of sub-optimal dose selections, which is unprecedented for dose-finding algorithms. Through a large simulation study, we then show that variants of Thompson Sampling based on more sophisticated prior distributions outperform state-of-the-art dose identification algorithms in different types of dose-finding studies that occur in phase I or phase I/II trials. Maryam Aziz, Emilie Kaufmann, Marie-Karelle Riviere |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 3 |