Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Julia L. MacIsaac

dblp:176/9982 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
—ORCID · conflict

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
epigenomics
0.212016
funtooNorm: an R package for normalization of DNA methylation data when there are multiple cell or tissue types · Bioinform. 2016
Bioinformatics and computational biology › gene expression analysis
microarray data analysis
0.112016
funtooNorm: an R package for normalization of DNA methylation data when there are multiple cell or tissue types · Bioinform. 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

functional normalization · 0.2cross-validation · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 PRS-on-Spark (PRSoS): a novel, efficient and flexible approach for generating polygenic risk scores
abstract
BACKGROUND: Polygenic risk scores (PRS) describe the genomic contribution to complex phenotypes and consistently account for a larger proportion of variance in outcome than single nucleotide polymorphisms (SNPs) alone. However, there is little consensus on the optimal data input for generating PRS, and existing approaches largely preclude the use of imputed posterior probabilities and strand-ambiguous SNPs i.e., A/T or C/G polymorphisms. Our ability to predict complex traits that arise from the additive effects of a large number of SNPs would likely benefit from a more inclusive approach. RESULTS: We developed PRS-on-Spark (PRSoS), a software implemented in Apache Spark and Python that accommodates different data inputs and strand-ambiguous SNPs to calculate PRS. We compared performance between PRSoS and an existing software (PRSice v1.25) for generating PRS for major depressive disorder using a community cohort (N = 264). We found PRSoS to perform faster than PRSice v1.25 when PRS were generated for a large number of SNPs (~ 17 million SNPs; t = 42.865, p = 5.43E-04). We also show that the use of imputed posterior probabilities and the inclusion of strand-ambiguous SNPs increase the proportion of variance explained by a PRS for major depressive disorder (from 4.3% to 4.8%). CONCLUSIONS: PRSoS provides the user with the ability to generate PRS using an inclusive and efficient approach that considers a larger number of SNPs than conventional approaches. We show that a PRS for major depressive disorder that includes strand-ambiguous SNPs, calculated using PRSoS, accounts for the largest proportion of variance in symptoms of depression in a community cohort, demonstrating the utility of this approach. The availability of this software will help users develop more informative PRS for a variety of complex phenotypes.
Lawrence M. Chen, Nelson Yao, Elika Garg, Yuecai Zhu, Thao T. T. Nguyen, Irina Pokhvisneva, Shantala A. Hari Dass, Eva Unternaehrer, Hélène Gaudreau, Marie Forest, Lisa M. McEwen, Julia L. MacIsaac, Michael S. Kobor, Celia M. T. Greenwood, Patricia P. Silveira, Michael J. Meaney 0001, Kieran J. O'Donnell
BMC Bioinform.12
2016 funtooNorm: an R package for normalization of DNA methylation data when there are multiple cell or tissue types
abstract
MOTIVATION: DNA methylation patterns are well known to vary substantially across cell types or tissues. Hence, existing normalization methods may not be optimal if they do not take this into account. We therefore present a new R package for normalization of data from the Illumina Infinium Human Methylation450 BeadChip (Illumina 450 K) built on the concepts in the recently published funNorm method, and introducing cell-type or tissue-type flexibility. RESULTS: funtooNorm is relevant for data sets containing samples from two or more cell or tissue types. A visual display of cross-validated errors informs the choice of the optimal number of components in the normalization. Benefits of cell (tissue)-specific normalization are demonstrated in three data sets. Improvement can be substantial; it is strikingly better on chromosome X, where methylation patterns have unique inter-tissue variability. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: An R package is available at https://github.com/GreenwoodLab/funtooNorm, and has been submitted to Bioconductor at http://bioconductor.org.
Kathleen Oros Klein, Stepan Grinek, Sasha Bernatsky, Luigi Bouchard, Antonio Ciampi, Ines Colmegna, Jean-Philippe Fortin, Marie-France Hivert, Marie Hudson, Michael S. Kobor, Aurélie Labbe, Julia L. MacIsaac, Michael J. Meaney 0001, Alexander M. Morin, Kieran J. O'Donnell, Tomi Pastinen, Marinus H. Van Ijzendoorn, Gregory Voisin, Celia M. T. Greenwood
Bioinform.13