Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Robert J. N. Baldock
dblp:177/1664
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2021
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
Deep learning architectures and training · 58% Trustworthy machine learning · 42% |
Topics — the 4 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
training dynamics |
0.9 | 2 | 2021 | Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficulty · NeurIPS 2021 What Do Neural Networks Learn When Trained With Random Labels? · NeurIPS 2020 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › Data-centric AI
example difficulty |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficulty · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
interpretability |
0.5 | 1 | 2021 | Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example Difficulty · NeurIPS 2021 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training
pretraining effects |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | What Do Neural Networks Learn When Trained With Random Labels? · NeurIPS 2020 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
uncertainty analysis · 0.5prediction depth measurement · 0.5principal component analysis · 0.4fine-tuning · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2021 | Deep Learning Through the Lens of Example DifficultyabstractExisting work on understanding deep learning often employs measures that compress all data-dependent information into a few numbers. In this work, we adopt a perspective based on the role of individual examples. We introduce a measure of the computational difficulty of making a prediction for a given input: the (effective) prediction depth. Our extensive investigation reveals surprising yet simple relationships between the prediction depth of a given input and the model’s uncertainty, confidence, accuracy and speed of learning for that data point. We further categorize difficult examples into three interpretable groups, demonstrate how these groups are processed differently inside deep models and showcase how this understanding allows us to improve prediction accuracy. Insights from our study lead to a coherent view of a number of separately reported phenomena in the literature: early layers generalize while later layers memorize; early layers converge faster and networks learn easy data and simple functions first. Robert J. N. Baldock, Hartmut Maennel, Behnam Neyshabur |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2020 | What Do Neural Networks Learn When Trained With Random Labels?abstractWe study deep neural networks (DNNs) trained on natural image data with entirely random labels. Despite its popularity in the literature, where it is often used to study memorization, generalization, and other phenomena, little is known about what DNNs learn in this setting. In this paper, we show analytically for convolutional and fully connected networks that an alignment between the principal components of network parameters and data takes place when training with random labels. We study this alignment effect by investigating neural networks pre-trained on randomly labelled image data and subsequently fine-tuned on disjoint datasets with random or real labels. We show how this alignment produces a positive transfer: networks pre-trained with random labels train faster downstream compared to training from scratch even after accounting for simple effects, such as weight scaling. We analyze how competing effects, such as specialization at later layers, may hide the positive transfer. These effects are studied in several network architectures, including VGG16 and ResNet18, on CIFAR10 and ImageNet. Hartmut Maennel, Ibrahim Alabdulmohsin, Ilya O. Tolstikhin, Robert J. N. Baldock, Olivier Bousquet, Sylvain Gelly, Daniel Keysers |
NeurIPS | 4 |