Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Huub Heijnen
dblp:177/3719
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 1 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
2 papers |
3D vision · 70% Legged, aerial and field robots · 23% Transfer learning and domain adaptation · 7% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Computer vision › 3D vision
feature matching |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learning · CVPR 2019 |
Computer vision › 3D vision › local feature descriptor
local descriptor learning |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learning · CVPR 2019 |
Robotics › Legged, aerial and field robots › bio-inspired robot
evolutionary robotics |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | A testbed that evolves hexapod controllers in hardware · ICRA 2017 |
Computer vision › 3D vision
structure from motion |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor Learning · CVPR 2019 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
sim-to-real transfer |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | A testbed that evolves hexapod controllers in hardware · ICRA 2017 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
von mises-fischer distribution · 0.4second order similarity · 0.4multi-objective evolutionary algorithm · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2019 | SOSNet: Second Order Similarity Regularization for Local Descriptor LearningabstractDespite the fact that Second Order Similarity (SOS) has been used with significant success in tasks such as graph matching and clustering, it has not been exploited for learning local descriptors. In this work, we explore the potential of \sos in the field of descriptor learning by building upon the intuition that a positive pair of matching points should exhibit similar distances with respect to other points in the embedding space. Thus, we propose a novel regularization term, named Second Order Similarity Regularization (SOSR), that follows this principle. By incorporating SOSR into training, our learned descriptor achieves state-of-the-art performance on several challenging benchmarks containing distinct tasks ranging from local patch retrieval to structure from motion. Furthermore, by designing a von Mises-Fischer distribution based evaluation method, we link the utilization of the descriptor space to the matching performance, thus demonstrating the effectiveness of our proposed SOSR. Extensive experimental results, empirical evidence, and in-depth analysis are provided, indicating that SOSR can significantly boost the matching performance of the learned descriptor. Yurun Tian, Xin Yu 0002, Bin Fan 0001, Fuchao Wu, Huub Heijnen, Vassileios Balntas |
CVPR | 5 |
| 2017 | A testbed that evolves hexapod controllers in hardwareabstractEvolutionary algorithms have previously shown promise in generating controllers for legged robots. Multiple evaluations across many evolutionary generations are typically required - simulators are frequently used to accommodate this. However, performance degradation is frequently observed when transferring controllers from simulation to reality due to inconsistencies between the two. In this paper we demonstrate a testbed that permits repeated, direct evolution of hexapod controllers as a closed-loop system. The testbed uses a two-stage evolutionary process. In stage 1, a multi-objective evolutionary algorithm spreads a population of controllers across a space of desirable criteria. The second stage allows for specific criteria to be selected for on a per-mission basis, with promising initial controller parameters taken from the first stage. As the optimisation occurs directly on the robot, performance is guaranteed. Furthermore, controllers can be made specific to irregularities in e.g., motor wear, and robot mass distribution, creating controllers that are sensitive to the hardware state of the individual robot. Huub Heijnen, Gerard David Howard, Navinda Kottege |
ICRA | 1 |