Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Henry Bard

dblp:177/8649 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
human-robot collaboration
0.212016
Natural Human-Robot Interaction Using Social Cues · HRI 2016
Human-robot interaction
social cues
0.212016
Natural Human-Robot Interaction Using Social Cues · HRI 2016
Human-robot interaction › robot control
pick-and-place task
0.112016
Natural Human-Robot Interaction Using Social Cues · HRI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

user study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 Natural Human-Robot Interaction Using Social Cues
abstract
This paper investigates the problem of how humans understand and control human-robot collaborative action and how to build natural interactions during human-robot collaborative action. We use a `pick and place' experiment to study collaborative activities between a human and a robot. The results show that even if human participants had a good understanding of the maximum reachability of the robot, they consistently take a surprisingly long time to help and assist the robot when a target object is out of its reach. We implemented a number of social cues in the experiment, analysed their effects in order to identify the role they could play to improve the fluency of human-robot collaboration. The experimental results showed that when the robot uses head movements, two hands or a gesture to indicate non-reachability, people react in a more natural way to assist the robot.
Hugo Romat, Mary-Anne Williams, Xun Wang 0006, Benjamin Johnston, Henry Bard
HRI5