Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Bobby Glushko

dblp:179/4568 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-2387-5761ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 100%

Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
community governance
0.212016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
online communities
0.212016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
social media
0.212016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing › social computing
platform governance
0.112016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016
Collaborative and social computing
social computing
0.112016
"Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

exit-voice-loyalty framework · 0.2case study · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2016 "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's
abstract
In human-computer interaction research and practice, policy concerns can sometimes fall to the margins, orbiting at the periphery of the traditionally core interests of design and practice. This perspective ignores the important ways that policy is bound up with the technical and behavioral elements of the HCI universe. Policy concerns are triggered as a matter of course in social computing, CSCW, systems engineering, UX, and related contexts because technological design, social practice and policy are dynamically entangled and mutually constitutive. Through this research, we demonstrate the value of a stronger emphasis on policy in HCI by exploring a recent controversy on Reddit: "AMAgeddon." Applying Hirschman's exit, voice and loyalty framework, we argue that the sustainability of online communities like Reddit will require successful navigation of the complex and often murky intersections among technical design and human interaction through a distributed participatory policymaking process that promotes user loyalty.
Alissa Centivany, Bobby Glushko
CHI2