Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Bobby Glushko
dblp:179/4568
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-2387-5761ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Collaborative and social computing · 100% |
Topics — the 5 heaviest of 5, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Collaborative and social computing › online communities
community governance |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing
online communities |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing
social media |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing › social computing
platform governance |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016 |
Collaborative and social computing
social computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit's · CHI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
exit-voice-loyalty framework · 0.2case study · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | "Popcorn Tastes Good": Participatory Policymaking and Reddit'sabstractIn human-computer interaction research and practice, policy concerns can sometimes fall to the margins, orbiting at the periphery of the traditionally core interests of design and practice. This perspective ignores the important ways that policy is bound up with the technical and behavioral elements of the HCI universe. Policy concerns are triggered as a matter of course in social computing, CSCW, systems engineering, UX, and related contexts because technological design, social practice and policy are dynamically entangled and mutually constitutive. Through this research, we demonstrate the value of a stronger emphasis on policy in HCI by exploring a recent controversy on Reddit: "AMAgeddon." Applying Hirschman's exit, voice and loyalty framework, we argue that the sustainability of online communities like Reddit will require successful navigation of the complex and often murky intersections among technical design and human interaction through a distributed participatory policymaking process that promotes user loyalty. Alissa Centivany, Bobby Glushko |
CHI | 2 |