Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Selim Ölçer
dblp:179/4851
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2016
0000-0002-8270-7055ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Immersive interaction · 44% Usability and user experience research · 44% Interaction techniques and input · 13% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Immersive interaction › head-mounted display
head-mounted projection display |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Head Mounted Projection Display & Visual Attention: Visual Attentional Processing of Head Referenced Static and Dynamic Displays while in Motion and Standing · CHI 2016 |
Usability and user experience research › visual perception
visual attention |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Head Mounted Projection Display & Visual Attention: Visual Attentional Processing of Head Referenced Static and Dynamic Displays while in Motion and Standing · CHI 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
user study · 0.2eye tracking · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2016 | Head Mounted Projection Display & Visual Attention: Visual Attentional Processing of Head Referenced Static and Dynamic Displays while in Motion and StandingabstractThe Head Mounted Projection Display (HMPD) is a growing interest area in HCI. Although various aspects of HMPDs have been investigated, there is not enough information regarding the effect of HMPDs (i.e., head referenced static and dynamic displays while a user is in motion and standing) on visual attentional performance. For this purpose, we conducted a user study (N=18) with three experimental conditions (control, standing, walking) and two visual perceptual tasks (with dynamic and static displays). Significant differences between conditions were only found for the task with dynamic display; accuracy was lower in walking condition compared to the other two conditions. Our work contributes an empirical investigation of the effect of HMPDs on visual attentional performance by providing data-driven benchmarks for developing graphical user interface design guidelines for HMPDs. Çaglar Genç, Shoaib Soomro, Yalçin Duyan, Selim Ölçer, Fuat Balci, Hakan Urey, Oguzhan Özcan |
CHI | 4 |