Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Christian Dina
dblp:179/5704
· DBLP profile ↗
2ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0002-7722-7348ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 2
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
2 papers |
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100% |
Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome-wide association study
epistasis detection |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SMMB: a stochastic Markov blanket framework strategy for epistasis detection in GWAS · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
genome-wide association study |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SMMB: a stochastic Markov blanket framework strategy for epistasis detection in GWAS · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
ancestry inference |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing the Jaccard index to reveal population stratification in sequencing data: a simulation study and an application to the 1000 Genomes Project · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
population genetics |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing the Jaccard index to reveal population stratification in sequencing data: a simulation study and an application to the 1000 Genomes Project · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › population genetics
population stratification |
0.2 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing the Jaccard index to reveal population stratification in sequencing data: a simulation study and an application to the 1000 Genomes Project · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › network bioinformatics › biological network analysis › network analysis
causal network analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2018 | SMMB: a stochastic Markov blanket framework strategy for epistasis detection in GWAS · Bioinform. 2018 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing the Jaccard index to reveal population stratification in sequencing data: a simulation study and an application to the 1000 Genomes Project · Bioinform. 2016 |
Bioinformatics and computational biology › statistical genetics
rare variant analysis |
0.1 | 1 | 2016 | Utilizing the Jaccard index to reveal population stratification in sequencing data: a simulation study and an application to the 1000 Genomes Project · Bioinform. 2016 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
random forest · 0.3bayesian markov blanket · 0.3jaccard index · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2018 | SMMB: a stochastic Markov blanket framework strategy for epistasis detection in GWASabstractMotivation: Large scale genome-wide association studies (GWAS) are tools of choice for discovering associations between genotypes and phenotypes. To date, many studies rely on univariate statistical tests for association between the phenotype and each assayed single nucleotide polymorphism (SNP). However, interaction between SNPs, namely epistasis, must be considered when tackling the complexity of underlying biological mechanisms. Epistasis analysis at large scale entails a prohibitive computational burden when addressing the detection of more than two interacting SNPs. In this paper, we introduce a stochastic causal graph-based method, SMMB, to analyze epistatic patterns in GWAS data. Results: We present Stochastic Multiple Markov Blanket algorithm (SMMB), which combines both ensemble stochastic strategy inspired from random forests and Bayesian Markov blanket-based methods. We compared SMMB with three other recent algorithms using both simulated and real datasets. Our method outperforms the other compared methods for a majority of simulated cases of 2-way and 3-way epistasis patterns (especially in scenarii where minor allele frequencies of causal SNPs are low). Our approach performs similarly as two other compared methods for large real datasets, in terms of power, and runs faster. Availability and implementation: Parallel version available on https://ls2n.fr/listelogicielsequipe/DUKe/128/. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Clément Niel, Christine Sinoquet, Christian Dina, Ghislain Rocheleau |
Bioinform. | 3 |
| 2016 | Utilizing the Jaccard index to reveal population stratification in sequencing data: a simulation study and an application to the 1000 Genomes ProjectabstractMOTIVATION: Population stratification is one of the major sources of confounding in genetic association studies, potentially causing false-positive and false-negative results. Here, we present a novel approach for the identification of population substructure in high-density genotyping data/next generation sequencing data. The approach exploits the co-appearances of rare genetic variants in individuals. The method can be applied to all available genetic loci and is computationally fast. Using sequencing data from the 1000 Genomes Project, the features of the approach are illustrated and compared to existing methodology (i.e. EIGENSTRAT). We examine the effects of different cutoffs for the minor allele frequency on the performance of the approach. We find that our approach works particularly well for genetic loci with very small minor allele frequencies. The results suggest that the inclusion of rare-variant data/sequencing data in our approach provides a much higher resolution picture of population substructure than it can be obtained with existing methodology. Furthermore, in simulation studies, we find scenarios where our method was able to control the type 1 error more precisely and showed higher power. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online. Dmitry Prokopenko, Julian Hecker, Edwin K. Silverman, Marcello Pagano, Markus M. Nöthen, Christian Dina, Christoph Lange 0003, Heide Loehlein Fier |
Bioinform. | 6 |