Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

William M. Hasling

dblp:18/1990 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2013
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers
Software testing · 93% Software maintenance and evolution · 7%
Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
1 paper
Medical and health informatics · 100%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software testing
model-based testing
0.112008
Applying model-based testing to healthcare products: preliminary experiences · ICSE 2008
Software maintenance and evolution
software configuration management
0.011989
Configuration Management in BiiN SMS · ICSE 1989
Distributed systems
distributed coordination and fault tolerance
0.011989
Configuration Management in BiiN SMS · ICSE 1989

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

use models · 0.2model-based testing · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2013 Experiences using Tedeso: an extensible and interoperable model-based testing platform
Roberto Silveira Silva Filho, William M. Hasling, Christof J. Budnik, Monica McKenna
Autom. Softw. Eng.2
2008 Applying model-based testing to healthcare products: preliminary experiences
abstract
Healthcare software systems are becoming more and more complex since they will be highly integrated to support a wide variety of healthcare workflows (e.g., financial, administration, diagnosis, and treatment). In addition, healthcare software systems will be more safety-critical as they will provide medical decision support for doctors. All of those require systematic and thorough testing of the systems before they are put into use or upgraded. Model-Based Testing (MBT) is an approach to apply formal, explicit system use-models to generate the test cases for testing the system behaviors under different input data sets. This paper describes our experiences in applying this approach to testing some Siemens healthcare software systems. We will report the benefits and challenges in using MBT for testing healthcare software systems.
Marlon Vieira, Xiping Song, Gilberto Matos, Stephan Storck, Rajanikanth Tanikella, William M. Hasling
ICSE6
2007 Process Investigations for the Global Studio Project Version 3.0
abstract
In this paper we present an overview of current plans for the global studio project version 3.0. version 3.0 applies a new experimental process with a higher degree of collaboration and that relies less on the central team, as compared to the extended workbench model. We expect that the use of an architecture for component integration and the identification of domain experts for each component will significantly reduce the amount of upfront architecture and requirements work usually required from the central team in the extended workbench model.
Alberto Avritzer, William M. Hasling, Daniel J. Paulish
ICGSE2
1989 Configuration Management in BiiN SMS
Robert W. Schwanke, Ellis S. Cohen, Raimund Gluecker, William M. Hasling, D. A. Son, Michael E. Wagner
ICSE4