Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Asaf Cohen 0003
dblp:18/1993-3
· DBLP profile ↗
1ranked-venue papers
1as first author
1since 2021 · last 2024
0000-0002-9211-7956ORCID · verified
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-author · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
1 paper |
Reinforcement learning · 50% Deep learning architectures and training · 50% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning › multi-agent reinforcement learning
mean field games |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Backward and Galerkin Methods for the Finite State Master Equation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › scientific machine learning
neural network approximation of PDEs |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Deep Backward and Galerkin Methods for the Finite State Master Equation · J. Mach. Learn. Res. 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
neural network approximation · 0.8galerkin method · 0.8backward induction · 0.8
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2024 | Deep Backward and Galerkin Methods for the Finite State Master EquationabstractThis paper proposes and analyzes two neural network methods to solve the master equation for finite-state mean field games (MFGs). Solving MFGs provides approximate Nash equilibria for stochastic, differential games with finite but large populations of agents. The master equation is a partial differential equation (PDE) whose solution characterizes MFG equilibria for any possible initial distribution. The first method we propose relies on backward induction in a time component while the second method directly tackles the PDE without discretizing time. For both approaches, we prove two types of results: there exist neural networks that make the algorithms' loss functions arbitrarily small and conversely, if the losses are small, then the neural networks are good approximations of the master equation's solution. We conclude the paper with numerical experiments on benchmark problems from the literature up to dimension 15, and a comparison with solutions computed by a classical method for fixed initial distributions. Asaf Cohen 0003, Mathieu Laurière, Ethan C. Zell |
J. Mach. Learn. Res. | 1 |