Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Maria Puertas
dblp:18/8618
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
1as first author
0since 2021 · last 2014
—ORCID · none
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3 · 1 first-authorGraphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 2 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Biometric security · 100% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Biometric security › iris recognition
cross-sensor matching |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Cross-Sensor Iris Recognition through Kernel Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014 |
Biometric security
iris recognition |
0.2 | 1 | 2014 | Cross-Sensor Iris Recognition through Kernel Learning · IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. 2014 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
metric learning · 0.2kernel learning · 0.2
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2014 | Cross-Sensor Iris Recognition through Kernel LearningabstractDue to the increasing popularity of iris biometrics, new sensors are being developed for acquiring iris images and existing ones are being continuously upgraded. Re-enrolling users every time a new sensor is deployed is expensive and time-consuming, especially in applications with a large number of enrolled users. However, recent studies show that cross-sensor matching, where the test samples are verified using data enrolled with a different sensor, often lead to reduced performance. In this paper, we propose a machine learning technique to mitigate the cross-sensor performance degradation by adapting the iris samples from one sensor to another. We first present a novel optimization framework for learning transformations on iris biometrics. We then utilize this framework for sensor adaptation, by reducing the distance between samples of the same class, and increasing it between samples of different classes, irrespective of the sensors acquiring them. Extensive evaluations on iris data from multiple sensors demonstrate that the proposed method leads to improvement in cross-sensor recognition accuracy. Furthermore, since the proposed technique requires minimal changes to the iris recognition pipeline, it can easily be incorporated into existing iris recognition systems. Jaishanker K. Pillai, Maria Puertas, Rama Chellappa |
IEEE Trans. Pattern Anal. Mach. Intell. | 2 |
| 2010 | Phone-Conditioned Suboptimal Wiener FilteringabstractA novel way of managing the compromise between noise reduction and speech distortion in Wiener filters is presented. It is based on adjusting the amount of noise reduced, and therefore the speech distortion introduced, on a phone-by-phone basis. We show empirically that optimal Wiener filters produce different amounts of speech distortion for different phones. Therefore we propose a phone-conditioned suboptimal Wiener filter that uses different amounts of noise reduction for each phone, based on a previous estimation of the amount of distortion introduced. Speech recognition results have shown that phone conditioning suboptimal Wiener filtering can provide almost a 5% additional relative improvement in word accuracy over comparable optimal Wiener filtering. Guillermo Gonzalez-Caravaca, Doroteo T. Toledano, Maria Puertas |
ICPR | 3 |
| 2010 | Towards a Better Understanding of the Performance of Latent Fingerprint Recognition in Realistic Forensic ConditionsabstractThis work studies the performance of a state-of-the-art fingerprint recognition technology, in several practical scenarios of interest in forensic casework. First, the differences in performance between manual and automatic minutiae extraction for latent fingerprints are presented. Then, automatic minutiae extraction is analyzed using three different types of fingerprints: latent, rolled and plain. The experiments are carried out using a database of latent finger marks and fingerprint impressions from real forensic cases. The results show high performance degradation in automatic minutiae extraction compared to manual extraction by human experts. Moreover, high degradation in performance on latent finger marks can be observed in comparison to fingerprint impressions. Maria Puertas, Daniel Ramos-Castro, Julian Fierrez, Javier Ortega-Garcia, Nicomedes Exposito |
ICPR | 1 |