Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Adam Paszke
dblp:180/5716
· DBLP profile ↗
8ranked-venue papers
3as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0000-0002-7665-4559ORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Software engineering, systems software and programming languages · 4 · 1 first-author · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 1 since 2021Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 1 · 1 first-authorDatabases, data management, data science and information retrieval · 1Theory of computation · 1 · 1 first-author
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
3 papers |
Efficient and distributed learning · 89% Deep learning architectures and training · 11% | |
| Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
2 papers |
Compilers and program optimization · 41% Programming languages and type systems · 32% Runtime systems and virtual machines · 18% | |
| Computer architecture, parallel and distributed computing, and storage systems
2 papers |
Parallel and multicore computing · 88% GPUs and heterogeneous computing · 12% |
Topics — the 12 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning
distributed training |
1.3 | 2 | 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025 PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training › parallelization
model partitioning |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Parallel and multicore computing
parallelization strategies |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine Learning · ASPLOS (1) 2025 |
Compilers and program optimization
automatic differentiation |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | You Only Linearize Once: Tangents Transpose to Gradients · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023 |
Programming languages and type systems › type systems › substructural type systems
linear types |
0.7 | 1 | 2023 | You Only Linearize Once: Tangents Transpose to Gradients · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
data parallel training |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › distributed training
gradient aggregation |
0.4 | 1 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
Machine learning › Deep learning architectures and training › deep learning systems
deep learning framework |
0.4 | 1 | 2019 | PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library · NeurIPS 2019 |
Operating systems › fault tolerance
checkpoint and rollback |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | You Only Linearize Once: Tangents Transpose to Gradients · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023 |
Compilers and program optimization
partial evaluation |
0.2 | 1 | 2023 | You Only Linearize Once: Tangents Transpose to Gradients · Proc. ACM Program. Lang. 2023 |
Machine learning › Efficient and distributed learning › large-scale learning
large-scale model training |
0.1 | 1 | 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel Training · Proc. VLDB Endow. 2020 |
GPUs and heterogeneous computing
GPU computing |
0.1 | 1 | 2019 | PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning Library · NeurIPS 2019 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
schedule-like API · 1.7intermediate representation rewriting · 1.7unzipping · 0.7transposition · 0.7forward-mode AD · 0.7gradient bucketing · 0.4computation-communication overlap · 0.4
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | PartIR: Composing SPMD Partitioning Strategies for Machine LearningabstractTraining modern large neural networks (NNs) requires a combination of parallelization strategies, including data, model, or optimizer sharding. To address the growing complexity of these strategies, we introduce PartIR, a hardware-and-runtime agnostic NN partitioning system. PartIR is: 1) Expressive: It allows for the composition of multiple sharding strategies, whether user-defined or automatically derived; 2) Decoupled: the strategies are separate from the ML implementation; and 3) Predictable: It follows a set of well-defined general rules to partition the NN. PartIR utilizes a schedule-like API that incrementally rewrites the ML program intermediate representation (IR) after each strategy, allowing simulators and users to verify the strategy's performance. PartIR has been successfully used both for training large models and across diverse model architectures, demonstrating its predictability, expressiveness, and performance. Sami Alabed, Daniel Belov, Bart Chrzaszcz, Juliana Franco, Dominik Grewe, Dougal Maclaurin, James Molloy, Tom Natan, Tamara Norman, Xiaoyue Pan, Adam Paszke, Norman A. Rink, Michael Schaarschmidt, Timur Sitdikov, Agnieszka Swietlik, Dimitrios Vytiniotis, Joel Wee |
ASPLOS (1) | 11 |
| 2024 | Parallel Algebraic Effect HandlersabstractAlgebraic effect handlers support composable and structured control-flow abstraction. However, existing designs of algebraic effects often require effects to be executed sequentially. This paper studies parallel algebraic effect handlers. In particular, we formalize λ p , a lambda calculus which models two key features, effect handlers and parallelizable computations, the latter of which takes the form of a for expression, inspired by the Dex programming language. We present various interesting examples expressible in our calculus. To show that our design can be implemented in a type-safe way, we present a higher-order polymorphic lambda calculus F p that extends λ p with a lightweight value dependent type system, and prove that F p preserves the semantics of λ p and enjoys syntactic type soundness. Lastly, we provide an implementation of the language design as a Haskell library, which mirrors both λ p and F p and reveals new connections to free applicative functors. All examples presented can be encoded in the Haskell implementation. We believe this paper is the first to study the combination of user-defined effect handlers and parallel computations, and it is our hope that it provides a basis for future designs and implementations of parallel algebraic effect handlers. Ningning Xie, Daniel D. Johnson 0001, Dougal Maclaurin, Adam Paszke |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 4 |
| 2023 | You Only Linearize Once: Tangents Transpose to GradientsabstractAutomatic differentiation (AD) is conventionally understood as a family of distinct algorithms, rooted in two “modes”—forward and reverse—which are typically presented (and implemented) separately. Can there be only one? Following up on the AD systems developed in the JAX and Dex projects, we formalize a decomposition of reverse-mode AD into (i) forward-mode AD followed by (ii) unzipping the linear and non-linear parts and then (iii) transposition of the linear part. To that end, we define a (substructurally) linear type system that can prove a class of functions are (algebraically) linear. Our main results are that forward-mode AD produces such linear functions, and that we can unzip and transpose any such linear function, conserving cost, size, and linearity. Composing these three transformations recovers reverse-mode AD. This decomposition also sheds light on checkpointing, which emerges naturally from a free choice in unzipping let expressions. As a corollary, checkpointing techniques are applicable to general-purpose partial evaluation, not just AD. We hope that our formalization will lead to a deeper understanding of automatic differentiation and that it will simplify implementations, by separating the concerns of differentiation proper from the concerns of gaining efficiency (namely, separating the derivative computation from the act of running it backward). Alexey Radul, Adam Paszke, Roy Frostig, Matthew J. Johnson 0002, Dougal Maclaurin |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 2 |
| 2021 | Getting to the point: index sets and parallelism-preserving autodiff for pointful array programmingabstractWe present a novel programming language design that attempts to combine the clarity and safety of high-level functional languages with the efficiency and parallelism of low-level numerical languages. We treat arrays as eagerly-memoized functions on typed index sets, allowing abstract function manipulations, such as currying, to work on arrays. In contrast to composing primitive bulk-array operations, we argue for an explicit nested indexing style that mirrors application of functions to arguments. We also introduce a fine-grained typed effects system which affords concise and automatically-parallelized in-place updates. Specifically, an associative accumulation effect allows reverse-mode automatic differentiation of in-place updates in a way that preserves parallelism. Empirically, we benchmark against the Futhark array programming language, and demonstrate that aggressive inlining and type-driven compilation allows array programs to be written in an expressive, "pointful" style with little performance penalty. Adam Paszke, Daniel D. Johnson 0001, David Duvenaud, Dimitrios Vytiniotis, Alexey Radul, Matthew J. Johnson 0002, Jonathan Ragan-Kelley, Dougal Maclaurin |
Proc. ACM Program. Lang. | 1 |
| 2020 | VC Density of Set Systems Definable in Tree-Like GraphsabstractThe use of random samples to approximate properties of geometric configurations has been an influential idea for both combinatorial and algorithmic purposes. This chapter considers two related notions---$ε$-approximations and $ε$-nets---that capture the most important quantitative properties that one would expect from a random sample with respect to an underlying geometric configuration. Adam Paszke, Michal Pilipczuk |
MFCS | 1 |
| 2020 | PyTorch Distributed: Experiences on Accelerating Data Parallel TrainingabstractThis paper presents the design, implementation, and evaluation of the PyTorch distributed data parallel module. Py-Torch is a widely-adopted scientific computing package used in deep learning research and applications. Recent advances in deep learning argue for the value of large datasets and large models, which necessitates the ability to scale out model training to more computational resources. Data parallelism has emerged as a popular solution for distributed training thanks to its straightforward principle and broad applicability. In general, the technique of distributed data parallelism replicates the model on every computational resource to generate gradients independently and then communicates those gradients at each iteration to keep model replicas consistent. Despite the conceptual simplicity of the technique, the subtle dependencies between computation and communication make it non-trivial to optimize the distributed training efficiency. As of v1.5, PyTorch natively provides several techniques to accelerate distributed data parallel, including bucketing gradients, overlapping computation with communication, and skipping gradient synchronization. Evaluations show that, when configured appropriately, the PyTorch distributed data parallel module attains near-linear scalability using 256 GPUs. Yanli Zhao, Rohan Varma, Omkar Salpekar, Pieter Noordhuis, Teng Li 0009, Adam Paszke, Jeff Smith, Brian Vaughan, Pritam Damania, Soumith Chintala |
Proc. VLDB Endow. | 7 |
| 2019 | PyTorch: An Imperative Style, High-Performance Deep Learning LibraryabstractDeep learning frameworks have often focused on either usability or speed, but not both. PyTorch is a machine learning library that shows that these two goals are in fact compatible: it was designed from first principles to support an imperative and Pythonic programming style that supports code as a model, makes debugging easy and is consistent with other popular scientific computing libraries, while remaining efficient and supporting hardware accelerators such as GPUs. In this paper, we detail the principles that drove the implementation of PyTorch and how they are reflected in its architecture. We emphasize that every aspect of PyTorch is a regular Python program under the full control of its user. We also explain how the careful and pragmatic implementation of the key components of its runtime enables them to work together to achieve compelling performance. We demonstrate the efficiency of individual subsystems, as well as the overall speed of PyTorch on several commonly used benchmarks. Adam Paszke, Sam Gross, Francisco Massa, Adam Lerer, Gregory Chanan, Trevor Killeen, Zeming Lin, Natalia Gimelshein, Luca Antiga, Alban Desmaison, Andreas Köpf, Edward Z. Yang, Zach DeVito, Martin Raison, Alykhan Tejani, Sasank Chilamkurthy, Benoit Steiner, Soumith Chintala |
NeurIPS | 1 |
| 2017 | Evaluation of neural network architectures for embedded systemsabstractSince the emergence of Deep Neural Networks (DNNs) as a prominent technique in the field of computer vision, the ImageNet classification challenge has played a major role in advancing the state-of-the-art. While accuracy figures have steadily increased, the resource utilization of winning models has not been properly taken into account. In this work, we present a comprehensive analysis of important metrics in practical applications: accuracy, memory footprint, parameters, operations count, inference time and power consumption. Key findings are: (1) power consumption is independent of batch size and architecture; (2) accuracy and inference time are in a hyperbolic relationship; (3) energy constraint is an upper bound on the maximum achievable accuracy and model complexity; (4) the number of operations is a reliable estimate of the inference time. We believe our analysis provides a compelling set of information that helps design and engineer efficient DNNs. Alfredo Canziani, Eugenio Culurciello, Adam Paszke |
ISCAS | 3 |