Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Andrew W. McPherson

dblp:181/2397 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
9ranked-venue papers
4as first author
1since 2021 · last 2025
—ORCID · none

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 9 · 4 first-author · 1 since 2021

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Interdisciplinary, comprehensive, and emerging computing
6 papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology · 100%

Topics — the 13 heaviest of 13, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Bioinformatics and computational biology
cancer genomics
0.942018
Computational identification of micro-structural variations and their proteogenomic consequences in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Clonality inference in multiple tumor samples using phylogeny · Bioinform. 2015
Joint Inference of Genome Structure and Content in Heterogeneous Tumor Samples · RECOMB 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
structural variant detection
0.522018
Computational identification of micro-structural variations and their proteogenomic consequences in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Simultaneous Structural Variation Discovery in Multiple Paired-End Sequenced Genomes · RECOMB 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics
computational genomics
0.422015
Joint Inference of Genome Structure and Content in Heterogeneous Tumor Samples · RECOMB 2015
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › structural variation
genomic rearrangement detection
0.322012
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012
Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › phylogenetics
phylogenetic inference
0.212015
Clonality inference in multiple tumor samples using phylogeny · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics
gene fusion detection
0.112011
Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data · Bioinform. 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology
genomics
0.112011
Simultaneous Structural Variation Discovery in Multiple Paired-End Sequenced Genomes · RECOMB 2011
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics › proteogenomics
novel peptide identification
0.112018
Computational identification of micro-structural variations and their proteogenomic consequences in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › proteomics
proteogenomics
0.112018
Computational identification of micro-structural variations and their proteogenomic consequences in cancer · Bioinform. 2018
Bioinformatics and computational biology › genomics › genome organization
genome structure inference
0.112015
Joint Inference of Genome Structure and Content in Heterogeneous Tumor Samples · RECOMB 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › cancer genomics › tumor heterogeneity
intra-tumor heterogeneity
0.112015
Clonality inference in multiple tumor samples using phylogeny · Bioinform. 2015
Bioinformatics and computational biology › sequence analysis
high-throughput sequencing data analysis
0.012012
Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing · RECOMB 2012
Bioinformatics and computational biology
transcriptomics
0.012011
Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data · Bioinform. 2011

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

mass spectrometry · 0.3gene fusion detection · 0.3joint inference · 0.2combinatorial optimization · 0.2high-throughput sequencing · 0.1integrated RNA-Seq and whole genome shotgun sequencing analysis · 0.1
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2025 CINner: Modeling and simulation of chromosomal instability in cancer at single-cell resolution
abstract
Cancer development is characterized by chromosomal instability, manifesting in frequent occurrences of different genomic alteration mechanisms ranging in extent and impact. Mathematical modeling can help evaluate the role of each mutational process during tumor progression, however existing frameworks can only capture certain aspects of chromosomal instability (CIN). We present CINner, a mathematical framework for modeling genomic diversity and selection during tumor evolution. The main advantage of CINner is its flexibility to incorporate many genomic events that directly impact cellular fitness, from driver gene mutations to copy number alterations (CNAs), including focal amplifications and deletions, missegregations and whole-genome duplication (WGD). We apply CINner to find chromosome-arm selection parameters that drive tumorigenesis in the absence of WGD in chromosomally stable cancer types from the Pan-Cancer Analysis of Whole Genomes (PCAWG, [Formula: see text]). We found that the selection parameters predict WGD prevalence among different chromosomally unstable tumors, hinting that the selective advantage of WGD cells hinges on their tolerance for aneuploidy and escape from nullisomy. Analysis of inference results using CINner across cancer types in The Cancer Genome Atlas ([Formula: see text]) further reveals that the inferred selection parameters reflect the bias between tumor suppressor genes and oncogenes on specific genomic regions. Direct application of CINner to model the WGD proportion and fraction of genome altered (FGA) in PCAWG uncovers the increase in CNA probabilities associated with WGD in each cancer type. CINner can also be utilized to study chromosomally stable cancer types, by applying a selection model based on driver gene mutations and focal amplifications or deletions (chronic lymphocytic leukemia in PCAWG, [Formula: see text]). Finally, we used CINner to analyze the impact of CNA probabilities, chromosome selection parameters, tumor growth dynamics and population size on cancer fitness and heterogeneity. We expect that CINner will provide a powerful modeling tool for the oncology community to quantify the impact of newly uncovered genomic alteration mechanisms on shaping tumor progression and adaptation.
Khanh N. Dinh, Ignacio Vázquez-García, Rhea Malhotra, Adam Weiner, Andrew W. McPherson, Simon Tavaré
PLoS Comput. Biol.6
2018 Computational identification of micro-structural variations and their proteogenomic consequences in cancer
abstract
Motivation: Rapid advancement in high throughput genome and transcriptome sequencing (HTS) and mass spectrometry (MS) technologies has enabled the acquisition of the genomic, transcriptomic and proteomic data from the same tissue sample. We introduce a computational framework, ProTIE, to integratively analyze all three types of omics data for a complete molecular profile of a tissue sample. Our framework features MiStrVar, a novel algorithmic method to identify micro structural variants (microSVs) on genomic HTS data. Coupled with deFuse, a popular gene fusion detection method we developed earlier, MiStrVar can accurately profile structurally aberrant transcripts in tumors. Given the breakpoints obtained by MiStrVar and deFuse, our framework can then identify all relevant peptides that span the breakpoint junctions and match them with unique proteomic signatures. Observing structural aberrations in all three types of omics data validates their presence in the tumor samples. Results: We have applied our framework to all The Cancer Genome Atlas (TCGA) breast cancer Whole Genome Sequencing (WGS) and/or RNA-Seq datasets, spanning all four major subtypes, for which proteomics data from Clinical Proteomic Tumor Analysis Consortium (CPTAC) have been released. A recent study on this dataset focusing on SNVs has reported many that lead to novel peptides. Complementing and significantly broadening this study, we detected 244 novel peptides from 432 candidate genomic or transcriptomic sequence aberrations. Many of the fusions and microSVs we discovered have not been reported in the literature. Interestingly, the vast majority of these translated aberrations, fusions in particular, were private, demonstrating the extensive inter-genomic heterogeneity present in breast cancer. Many of these aberrations also have matching out-of-frame downstream peptides, potentially indicating novel protein sequence and structure. Availability and implementation: MiStrVar is available for download at https://bitbucket.org/compbio/mistrvar, and ProTIE is available at https://bitbucket.org/compbio/protie. Contact: [email protected]. Supplementary information: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Yen-Yi Lin, Alexander Gawronski, Faraz Hach, Sujun Li, Ibrahim Numanagic, Iman Sarrafi, Swati Mishra 0006, Andrew W. McPherson, Colin C. Collins, Milan Radovich, Haixu Tang, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
Bioinform.8
2015 Joint Inference of Genome Structure and Content in Heterogeneous Tumor Samples
Andrew W. McPherson, Andrew Roth, Cédric Chauve, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
RECOMB1
2015 Clonality inference in multiple tumor samples using phylogeny
abstract
MOTIVATION: Intra-tumor heterogeneity presents itself through the evolution of subclones during cancer progression. Although recent research suggests that this heterogeneity has clinical implications, in silico determination of the clonal subpopulations remains a challenge. RESULTS: We address this problem through a novel combinatorial method, named clonality inference in tumors using phylogeny (CITUP), that infers clonal populations and their frequencies while satisfying phylogenetic constraints and is able to exploit data from multiple samples. Using simulated datasets and deep sequencing data from two cancer studies, we show that CITUP predicts clonal frequencies and the underlying phylogeny with high accuracy. AVAILABILITY AND IMPLEMENTATION: CITUP is freely available at: http://sourceforge.net/projects/citup/. CONTACT: [email protected] SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION: Supplementary data are available at Bioinformatics online.
Salem Malikic, Andrew W. McPherson, Nilgun Donmez, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
Bioinform.2
2012 Discovery of Complex Genomic Rearrangements in Cancer Using High-Throughput Sequencing
Andrew W. McPherson, Chunxiao Wu, Alexander Wyatt, Sohrab P. Shah, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
RECOMB1
2011 Simultaneous Structural Variation Discovery in Multiple Paired-End Sequenced Genomes
Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Iman Hajirasouliha, Andrew W. McPherson, Evan E. Eichler, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
RECOMB3
2011 Comrad: detection of expressed rearrangements by integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and low coverage genome sequence data
abstract
MOTIVATION: Comrad is a novel algorithmic framework for the integrated analysis of RNA-Seq and whole genome shotgun sequencing (WGSS) data for the purposes of discovering genomic rearrangements and aberrant transcripts. The Comrad framework leverages the advantages of both RNA-Seq and WGSS data, providing accurate classification of rearrangements as expressed or not expressed and accurate classification of the genomic or non-genomic origin of aberrant transcripts. A major benefit of Comrad is its ability to accurately identify aberrant transcripts and associated rearrangements using low coverage genome data. As a result, a Comrad analysis can be performed at a cost comparable to that of two RNA-Seq experiments, significantly lower than an analysis requiring high coverage genome data. RESULTS: We have applied Comrad to the discovery of gene fusions and read-throughs in prostate cancer cell line C4-2, a derivative of the LNCaP cell line with androgen-independent characteristics. As a proof of concept, we have rediscovered in the C4-2 data 4 of the 6 fusions previously identified in LNCaP. We also identified six novel fusion transcripts and associated genomic breakpoints, and verified their existence in LNCaP, suggesting that Comrad may be more sensitive than previous methods that have been applied to fusion discovery in LNCaP. We show that many of the gene fusions discovered using Comrad would be difficult to identify using currently available techniques. AVAILABILITY: A C++ and Perl implementation of the method demonstrated in this article is available at http://compbio.cs.sfu.ca/.
Andrew W. McPherson, Chunxiao Wu, Iman Hajirasouliha, Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Faraz Hach, Anna Lapuk, Stanislav Volik, Sohrab P. Shah, Colin C. Collins, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp
Bioinform.1
2011 deFuse: An Algorithm for Gene Fusion Discovery in Tumor RNA-Seq Data
abstract
Gene fusions created by somatic genomic rearrangements are known to play an important role in the onset and development of some cancers, such as lymphomas and sarcomas. RNA-Seq (whole transcriptome shotgun sequencing) is proving to be a useful tool for the discovery of novel gene fusions in cancer transcriptomes. However, algorithmic methods for the discovery of gene fusions using RNA-Seq data remain underdeveloped. We have developed deFuse, a novel computational method for fusion discovery in tumor RNA-Seq data. Unlike existing methods that use only unique best-hit alignments and consider only fusion boundaries at the ends of known exons, deFuse considers all alignments and all possible locations for fusion boundaries. As a result, deFuse is able to identify fusion sequences with demonstrably better sensitivity than previous approaches. To increase the specificity of our approach, we curated a list of 60 true positive and 61 true negative fusion sequences (as confirmed by RT-PCR), and have trained an adaboost classifier on 11 novel features of the sequence data. The resulting classifier has an estimated value of 0.91 for the area under the ROC curve. We have used deFuse to discover gene fusions in 40 ovarian tumor samples, one ovarian cancer cell line, and three sarcoma samples. We report herein the first gene fusions discovered in ovarian cancer. We conclude that gene fusions are not infrequent events in ovarian cancer and that these events have the potential to substantially alter the expression patterns of the genes involved; gene fusions should therefore be considered in efforts to comprehensively characterize the mutational profiles of ovarian cancer transcriptomes.
Andrew W. McPherson, Fereydoun Hormozdiari, Abdalnasser Zayed, Ryan Giuliany, Gavin Ha, Mark G. F. Sun, Malachi Griffith, Alireza Heravi Moussavi, Janine Senz, Nataliya Melnyk, Marina Pacheco, Marco A. Marra, Martin Hirst, Torsten O. Nielsen, Süleyman Cenk Sahinalp, David G. Huntsman, Sohrab P. Shah
PLoS Comput. Biol.1
2009 Prediction of Contiguous Regions in the Amniote Ancestral Genome
Aïda Ouangraoua, Frédéric Boyer, Andrew W. McPherson, Eric Tannier, Cédric Chauve
ISBRA3