Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Brian Goldfain

dblp:181/4171 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
4ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2018
0000-0003-0754-8354ORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 3Systems, architecture and hardware · 3Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
4 papers
Motion planning and robot control · 77% Autonomous driving · 14% Reinforcement learning · 8%
Theoretical computer science
1 paper
Mathematical optimization · 100%

Topics — the 8 heaviest of 9, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control
model predictive control
1.242018
Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles · ICRA 2018
Information theoretic MPC for model-based reinforcement learning · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
multi-robot control
0.312018
Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control › robot control › model predictive control
sampling-based model predictive control
0.312018
Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
trajectory optimization
0.312018
Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles · ICRA 2018
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
model-based reinforcement learning
0.312017
Information theoretic MPC for model-based reinforcement learning · ICRA 2017
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
robot control
0.212016
Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control · ICRA 2016
Robotics › Motion planning and robot control
stochastic optimal control
0.212016
Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control · ICRA 2016
Mathematical optimization › control theory › optimal control
stochastic control
0.112018
Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving · IEEE Trans. Robotics 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

information-theoretic optimization · 0.7cross-entropy method · 0.7iterated best response · 0.3information-theoretic model predictive control · 0.3neural network dynamics model · 0.3information theoretic control · 0.3relative entropy · 0.2path integral control · 0.2importance sampling · 0.2free energy · 0.2
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2018 Best Response Model Predictive Control for Agile Interactions Between Autonomous Ground Vehicles
abstract
We introduce an algorithm for autonomous control of multiple fast ground vehicles operating in close proximity to each other. The algorithm is based on a combination of the game theoretic notion of iterated best response, and an information theoretic model predictive control algorithm designed for non-linear stochastic systems. We test the algorithm on two one-fifth scale AutoRally platforms traveling at speeds upwards of 8 meters per second, while maintaining a following distance of under two meters from bumper-to-bumper.
Grady Williams, Brian Goldfain, Paul Drews, James M. Rehg, Evangelos A. Theodorou
ICRA2
2018 Information-Theoretic Model Predictive Control: Theory and Applications to Autonomous Driving
abstract
We present an information-theoretic approach to stochastic optimal control problems that can be used to derive general sampling-based optimization schemes. This new mathematical method is used to develop a sampling-based model predictive control algorithm. We apply this information-theoretic model predictive control scheme to the task of aggressive autonomous driving around a dirt test track, and compare its performance with a model predictive control version of the cross-entropy method.
Grady Williams, Paul Drews, Brian Goldfain, James M. Rehg, Evangelos A. Theodorou
IEEE Trans. Robotics3
2017 Information theoretic MPC for model-based reinforcement learning
abstract
We introduce an information theoretic model predictive control (MPC) algorithm capable of handling complex cost criteria and general nonlinear dynamics. The generality of the approach makes it possible to use multi-layer neural networks as dynamics models, which we incorporate into our MPC algorithm in order to solve model-based reinforcement learning tasks. We test the algorithm in simulation on a cart-pole swing up and quadrotor navigation task, as well as on actual hardware in an aggressive driving task. Empirical results demonstrate that the algorithm is capable of achieving a high level of performance and does so only utilizing data collected from the system.
Grady Williams, Nolan Wagener, Brian Goldfain, Paul Drews, James M. Rehg, Byron Boots, Evangelos A. Theodorou
ICRA3
2016 Aggressive driving with model predictive path integral control
abstract
In this paper we present a model predictive control algorithm designed for optimizing non-linear systems subject to complex cost criteria. The algorithm is based on a stochastic optimal control framework using a fundamental relationship between the information theoretic notions of free energy and relative entropy. The optimal controls in this setting take the form of a path integral, which we approximate using an efficient importance sampling scheme. We experimentally verify the algorithm by implementing it on a Graphics Processing Unit (GPU) and apply it to the problem of controlling a fifth-scale Auto-Rally vehicle in an aggressive driving task.
Grady Williams, Paul Drews, Brian Goldfain, James M. Rehg, Evangelos A. Theodorou
ICRA3