Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Arka Pal
dblp:182/2408
· DBLP profile ↗
7ranked-venue papers
0as first author
4since 2021 · last 2025
0009-0008-5800-3550ORCID · reported
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 7 · 4 since 2021Systems, architecture and hardware · 1 · 1 since 2021
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Artificial intelligence
5 papers |
Language models and text generation · 43% Trustworthy machine learning · 26% Representation and self-supervised learning · 11% | |
| Network and information security
1 paper |
Security and privacy of machine learning · 50% Cryptographic protocols and secure computation · 50% |
Topics — the 14 heaviest of 15, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation › large language model evaluation
benchmark contamination |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model evaluation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Security and privacy of machine learning › privacy-preserving inference
private LLM inference |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hidden No More: Attacking and Defending Private Third-Party LLM Inference · ICML 2025 |
Cryptographic protocols and secure computation
secure multiparty computation |
0.9 | 1 | 2025 | Hidden No More: Attacking and Defending Private Third-Party LLM Inference · ICML 2025 |
Natural language and speech › Language models and text generation
large language model fine-tuning |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't Know · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning › uncertainty estimation › large language model uncertainty
LLM calibration |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't Know · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Trustworthy machine learning
uncertainty estimation |
0.8 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't Know · NeurIPS 2024 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › compositional representation
compositional representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2018 | SCAN: Learning Hierarchical Compositional Visual Concepts · ICLR (Poster) 2018 |
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning
disentangled representation learning |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | beta-VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
domain adaptation |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Transfer learning and domain adaptation
zero-shot transfer |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement Learning · ICML 2017 |
Machine learning › Generative modeling › variational autoencoder
β-VAE |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | beta-VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework · ICLR (Poster) 2017 |
Machine learning › Reinforcement learning
benchmark design |
0.3 | 1 | 2025 | LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM Benchmark · ICLR 2025 |
Human-AI interaction
human-AI collaboration |
0.2 | 1 | 2024 | Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't Know · NeurIPS 2024 |
Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics
fine-tuning · 1.5LoRA · 1.5crowdsourcing · 0.9automated scoring · 0.9variational autoencoder · 0.3disentangled representation learning · 0.3a3c · 0.3EC · 0.3DQN · 0.3
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2025 | LiveBench: A Challenging, Contamination-Limited LLM BenchmarkabstractTest set contamination, wherein test data from a benchmark ends up in a newer model's training set, is a well-documented obstacle for fair LLM evaluation and can quickly render benchmarks obsolete. To mitigate this, many recent benchmarks crowdsource new prompts and evaluations from human or LLM judges; however, these can introduce significant biases, and break down when scoring hard questions. In this work, we introduce a new benchmark for LLMs designed to be resistant to both test set contamination and the pitfalls of LLM judging and human crowdsourcing. We release LiveBench, the first benchmark that (1) contains frequently-updated questions from recent information sources, (2) scores answers automatically according to objective ground-truth values, and (3) contains a wide variety of challenging tasks, spanning math, coding, reasoning, language, instruction following, and data analysis. To achieve this, LiveBench contains questions that are based on recently-released math competitions, arXiv papers, news articles, and datasets, and it contains harder, contamination-limited versions of tasks from previous benchmarks such as Big-Bench Hard, AMPS, and IFEval. We evaluate many prominent closed-source models, as well as dozens of open-source models ranging from 0.5B to 405B in size. LiveBench is difficult, with top models achieving below 70% accuracy. We release all questions, code, and model answers. Questions are added and updated on a monthly basis, and we release new tasks and harder versions of tasks over time so that LiveBench can distinguish between the capabilities of LLMs as they improve in the future. We welcome community engagement and collaboration for expanding the benchmark tasks and models. Colin White, Samuel Dooley, Manley Roberts, Arka Pal, Benjamin Feuer, Siddhartha Jain 0001, Ravid Shwartz-Ziv, Neel Jain, Khalid Saifullah, Sreemanti Dey, Shubh-Agrawal, Sandeep Singh Sandha, Siddartha Naidu, Chinmay Hegde, Yann LeCun, Tom Goldstein, Willie Neiswanger, Micah Goldblum |
ICLR | 4 |
| 2025 | Hidden No More: Attacking and Defending Private Third-Party LLM InferenceabstractRecent advances in Large Language Models (LLMs) have led to widespread adoption of third-party inference services, raising critical privacy concerns. In this work, we introduce a novel reconstruction technique that can recover original prompts from hidden states with nearly perfect accuracy across multiple state-of-the-art LLMs in the increasingly important open-weights setting. Although the attack is conceptually simple, it has not -- to the best of our knowledge -- previously been described nor shown to work practically. Furthermore, our attack remains effective against various permutation and noise-based defenses, challenging assumptions about the security of previously proposed schemes. To address these vulnerabilities, we propose Cascade, a multi-party inference scheme that leverages sharding in the sequence dimension to retain privacy of the user input. Through theoretical analysis and empirical evaluation, we demonstrate that Cascade is secure against both our attack as well as previous methods, while maintaining computational and communication efficiency. Our findings highlight the importance of rigorous security analysis in privacy-preserving LLM inference and offer practical solutions for secure deployment. Rahul Krishna Thomas, Louai Zahran, Erica Choi, Akilesh Potti, Micah Goldblum, Arka Pal |
ICML | 6 |
| 2024 | A Soft Robotic System Automatically Learns Precise Agile Motions Without Model InformationabstractMany application domains, e.g., in medicine and manufacturing, can greatly benefit from pneumatic Soft Robots (SRs). However, the accurate control of SRs has remained a significant challenge to date, mainly due to their nonlinear dynamics and viscoelastic material properties. Conventional control design methods often rely on either complex system modeling or time-intensive manual tuning, both of which require significant amounts of human expertise and thus limit their practicality. In recent works, the data-driven method, Automatic Neural ODE Control (ANODEC) has been successfully used to – fully automatically and utilizing only input-output data – design controllers for various nonlinear systems in silico, and without requiring prior model knowledge or extensive manual tuning. In this work, we successfully apply ANODEC to automatically learn to perform agile, non-repetitive reference tracking motion tasks in a real-world SR and within a finite time horizon. To the best of the authors’ knowledge, ANODEC achieves, for the first time, performant control of a SR with hysteresis effects from only 30 s of input-output data and without any prior model knowledge. We show that for multiple, qualitatively different and even out-of-training-distribution reference signals, a single feedback controller designed by ANODEC outperforms a manually tuned PID baseline consistently. Overall, this contribution not only further strengthens the validity of ANODEC, but it marks an important step towards more practical, easy-to-use SRs that can automatically learn to perform agile motions from minimal experimental interaction time. Simon Bachhuber, Alexander Pawluchin, Arka Pal, Ivo Boblan, Thomas Seel |
IROS | 3 |
| 2024 | Large Language Models Must Be Taught to Know What They Don't KnowabstractWhen using large language models (LLMs) in high-stakes applications, we need to know when we can trust their predictions. Some works argue that prompting high-performance LLMs is sufficient to produce calibrated uncertainties, while others introduce sampling methods that can be prohibitively expensive. In this work, we first argue that prompting on its own is insufficient to achieve good calibration and then show that fine-tuning on a small dataset of correct and incorrect answers can create an uncertainty estimate with good generalization and small computational overhead. We show that a thousand graded examples are sufficient to outperform baseline methods and that training through the features of a model is necessary for good performance and tractable for large open-source models when using LoRA. We also investigate the mechanisms that enable reliable LLM uncertainty estimation, finding that many models can be used as general-purpose uncertainty estimators, applicable not just to their own uncertainties but also the uncertainty of other models. Lastly, we show that uncertainty estimates inform human use of LLMs in human-AI collaborative settings through a user study. Sanyam Kapoor, Nate Gruver, Manley Roberts, Katie Collins, Arka Pal, Umang Bhatt, Adrian Weller, Samuel Dooley, Micah Goldblum, Andrew Gordon Wilson |
NeurIPS | 5 |
| 2018 | SCAN: Learning Hierarchical Compositional Visual Concepts
Irina Higgins, Nicolas Sonnerat, Loïc Matthey, Arka Pal, Chris Burgess 0001, Matko Bosnjak, Murray Shanahan, Matt M. Botvinick, Demis Hassabis, Alexander Lerchner |
ICLR (Poster) | 4 |
| 2017 | beta-VAE: Learning Basic Visual Concepts with a Constrained Variational Framework
Irina Higgins, Loïc Matthey, Arka Pal, Chris Burgess 0001, Xavier Glorot, Matt M. Botvinick, Shakir Mohamed, Alexander Lerchner |
ICLR (Poster) | 3 |
| 2017 | DARLA: Improving Zero-Shot Transfer in Reinforcement LearningabstractDomain adaptation is an important open problem in deep reinforcement learning (RL). In many scenarios of interest data is hard to obtain, so agents may learn a source policy in a setting where data is readily available, with the hope that it generalises well to the target domain. We propose a new multi-stage RL agent, DARLA (DisentAngled Representation Learning Agent), which learns to see before learning to act. DARLA’s vision is based on learning a disentangled representation of the observed environment. Once DARLA can see, it is able to acquire source policies that are robust to many domain shifts – even with no access to the target domain. DARLA significantly outperforms conventional baselines in zero-shot domain adaptation scenarios, an effect that holds across a variety of RL environments (Jaco arm, DeepMind Lab) and base RL algorithms (DQN, A3C and EC). Irina Higgins, Arka Pal, Andrei A. Rusu, Loïc Matthey, Chris Burgess 0001, Alexander Pritzel, Matt M. Botvinick, Charles Blundell, Alexander Lerchner |
ICML | 2 |