Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Kirsty Aquilina

dblp:182/9228 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
2ranked-venue papers
2as first author
0since 2021 · last 2019
0000-0001-9762-9363ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Artificial intelligence and machine learning · 2 · 2 first-authorSystems, architecture and hardware · 2 · 2 first-author

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Artificial intelligence
2 papers
Robot manipulation · 77% Representation and self-supervised learning · 23%

Topics — the 3 heaviest of 4, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Robotics › Robot manipulation
tactile sensing
0.722019
Shear-invariant Sliding Contact Perception with a Soft Tactile Sensor · ICRA 2019
Principal Components of Touch · ICRA 2018
Robotics › Robot manipulation › manipulation control
contour following
0.412019
Shear-invariant Sliding Contact Perception with a Soft Tactile Sensor · ICRA 2019
Machine learning › Representation and self-supervised learning › representation learning › dimensionality reduction
principal component analysis
0.312018
Principal Components of Touch · ICRA 2018

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

principal component analysis · 0.7k-NN classifier · 0.3
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2019 Shear-invariant Sliding Contact Perception with a Soft Tactile Sensor
abstract
Manipulation tasks often require robots to be continuously in contact with an object. Therefore tactile perception systems need to handle continuous contact data. Shear deformation causes the tactile sensor to output path-dependent readings in contrast to discrete contact readings. As such, in some continuous-contact tasks, sliding can be regarded as a disturbance over the sensor signal. Here we present a shear-invariant perception method based on principal component analysis (PCA) which outputs the required information about the environment despite sliding motion. A compliant tactile sensor (the TacTip) is used to investigate continuous tactile contact. First, we evaluate the method offline using test data collected whilst the sensor slides over an edge. Then, the method is used within a contour-following task applied to 6 objects with varying curvatures; all contours are successfully traced. The method demonstrates generalisation capabilities and could underlie a more sophisticated controller for challenging manipulation or exploration tasks in unstructured environments.
Kirsty Aquilina, David A. W. Barton, Nathan F. Lepora
ICRA1
2018 Principal Components of Touch
abstract
Our human sense of touch enables us to manipulate our surroundings; therefore, complex robotic manipulation will require artificial tactile sensing. Typically tactile sensor arrays are used in robotics, implying that a straightforward way of interpreting multidimensional data is required. In this paper we present a simple visualisation approach based on applying principal component analysis (PCA) to systematically collected sets of tactile data. We apply the visualisation approach to 4 different types of tactile sensor, encompassing fingertips and vibrissal arrays. The results show that PCA can reveal structure and regularities in the tactile data, which also permits the use of simple classifiers such as k-NN to achieve good inference. Additionally, the Euclidean distance in principal component space gives a measure of sensitivity, which can aid visualisation and also be used to find regions in the tactile input space where the sensor is able to perceive with higher accuracy. We expect that these observations will generalise, and thus offer the potential for novel control methods based on touch.
Kirsty Aquilina, David A. W. Barton, Nathan F. Lepora
ICRA1