Demo Data from SIGIR 2026 / reviewers in the wild / expert
Sherrie Yuschak
dblp:183/0085
· DBLP profile ↗
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-0394-335XORCID · corroborated
Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several
Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1
Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.
| Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper |
Human-robot interaction · 77% Learning and educational technologies · 23% |
Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it
| Topic | Weight | Papers | Last | Evidence papers |
|---|---|---|---|---|
Human-robot interaction
animal-computer interaction |
0.3 | 1 | 2017 | Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2017 |
Learning and educational technologies › skill training
computer training |
0.1 | 1 | 2017 | Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2017 |
| Year | Publication | Venue | Position |
|---|---|---|---|
| 2017 | Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system
John Majikes, Rita Brugarolas Brufau, Michael Winters, Sherrie Yuschak, Sean Mealin, Katherine Walker, Barbara L. Sherman, Alper Bozkurt, David L. Roberts 0001 |
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. | 4 |
| 2016 | Towards a wearable system for continuous monitoring of sniffing and panting in dogsabstractAlthough numerous advances have been made in instrumental odor detection systems, these still cannot match the efficient sampling, odor discrimination, agile mobility and the olfactory acuity of odor detection dogs. A limiting step in using dogs to detect odors is the subjectivity of the translation of odor information processed by the dog to its handler. We present our preliminary efforts towards a wireless wearable system for continuous auscultation of respiratory behavior by recording internal sounds at the neck and chest by means of a commercially available electronic stethoscope to provide objective decision support for handlers. We have identified discrete features of sniffing and panting in the time domain and utilize event duration, event rate, event mean energy, and the number of consecutive events in a row to build a decision tree classifier. Since feature extraction requires segmentation of individual sniffing and panting events, we developed an adaptive method using short-time energy contour and an adaptive threshold. The performance of the system was evaluated on recordings from a Greyhound and a Labrador Retriever and achieved high classification accuracies. Rita Brugarolas Brufau, M. Talha Agcayazi, Sherrie Yuschak, David L. Roberts 0001, Barbara L. Sherman, Alper Bozkurt |
BSN | 3 |
| 2015 | Knowledge engineering for unsupervised canine posture detection from IMU dataabstractTraining animals is a process that requires a significant investment of time and energy on the part of the trainer. One of the most basic training tasks is to train dogs to perform postures on cue. While it might be easy for a human trainer to see when an animal has performed the desired posture, it is much more difficult for a computer to determine this. Most work in this area uses accelerometer and/or gyroscopic data to produce data from an animal's current state, but this has limitations. Take for example a normal standing posture. From an accelerometer's perspective, it closely resembles the "laying down" posture, but the posture can look very different if the animal is standing still, versus walking, versus running, and might look completely different from a "standing on incline" posture. A human trainer can instantly tell the difference between these postures and behaviors, but the process is much more difficult for a computer. Michael Winters, Rita Brugarolas Brufau, John Majikes, Sean Mealin, Sherrie Yuschak, Barbara L. Sherman, Alper Bozkurt, David L. Roberts 0001 |
Advances in Computer Entertainment | 5 |