Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Sherrie Yuschak

dblp:183/0085 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
3ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2017
0000-0002-0394-335XORCID · corroborated

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 2Graphics, computer vision, multimedia, augmented reality and games · 1Applied, interdisciplinary, general and emerging computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Human-robot interaction · 77% Learning and educational technologies · 23%

Topics — the 2 heaviest of 2, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Human-robot interaction
animal-computer interaction
0.312017
Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2017
Learning and educational technologies › skill training
computer training
0.112017
Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system · Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud. 2017
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2017 Balancing noise sensitivity, response latency, and posture accuracy for a computer-assisted canine posture training system
John Majikes, Rita Brugarolas Brufau, Michael Winters, Sherrie Yuschak, Sean Mealin, Katherine Walker, Barbara L. Sherman, Alper Bozkurt, David L. Roberts 0001
Int. J. Hum. Comput. Stud.4
2016 Towards a wearable system for continuous monitoring of sniffing and panting in dogs
abstract
Although numerous advances have been made in instrumental odor detection systems, these still cannot match the efficient sampling, odor discrimination, agile mobility and the olfactory acuity of odor detection dogs. A limiting step in using dogs to detect odors is the subjectivity of the translation of odor information processed by the dog to its handler. We present our preliminary efforts towards a wireless wearable system for continuous auscultation of respiratory behavior by recording internal sounds at the neck and chest by means of a commercially available electronic stethoscope to provide objective decision support for handlers. We have identified discrete features of sniffing and panting in the time domain and utilize event duration, event rate, event mean energy, and the number of consecutive events in a row to build a decision tree classifier. Since feature extraction requires segmentation of individual sniffing and panting events, we developed an adaptive method using short-time energy contour and an adaptive threshold. The performance of the system was evaluated on recordings from a Greyhound and a Labrador Retriever and achieved high classification accuracies.
Rita Brugarolas Brufau, M. Talha Agcayazi, Sherrie Yuschak, David L. Roberts 0001, Barbara L. Sherman, Alper Bozkurt
BSN3
2015 Knowledge engineering for unsupervised canine posture detection from IMU data
abstract
Training animals is a process that requires a significant investment of time and energy on the part of the trainer. One of the most basic training tasks is to train dogs to perform postures on cue. While it might be easy for a human trainer to see when an animal has performed the desired posture, it is much more difficult for a computer to determine this. Most work in this area uses accelerometer and/or gyroscopic data to produce data from an animal's current state, but this has limitations. Take for example a normal standing posture. From an accelerometer's perspective, it closely resembles the "laying down" posture, but the posture can look very different if the animal is standing still, versus walking, versus running, and might look completely different from a "standing on incline" posture. A human trainer can instantly tell the difference between these postures and behaviors, but the process is much more difficult for a computer.
Michael Winters, Rita Brugarolas Brufau, John Majikes, Sean Mealin, Sherrie Yuschak, Barbara L. Sherman, Alper Bozkurt, David L. Roberts 0001
Advances in Computer Entertainment5