Demonstration venue · read-only. Every page can be browsed; the buttons that would change it are switched off. Create an account to run TaxoReview on your own data. A simulation from public publication records: the people listed were not invited and did not agree to review.
? Tutorial for this page

Maria Eriksson

dblp:183/0438 · DBLP profile ↗
← Back
1ranked-venue papers
0as first author
0since 2021 · last 2020
0000-0002-7534-4268ORCID · reported

Domains — the database's venue-derived domains; a paper can count in several

Human-computer interaction and ubiquitous computing · 1

Expertise — from the expertise taxonomy: the topics of the expert's papers under the CCF categories. A weight counts papers with recency: 1 for a paper about the topic, 0.3 when the topic is its context, halved every five years.

Human-computer interaction and pervasive computing
1 paper
Collaborative and social computing · 50% Usability and user experience research · 50%
Software engineering, system software, and programming languages
1 paper
Software maintenance and evolution · 100%

Topics — the 1 heaviest of 3, each with the papers that count most for it

TopicWeightPapersLastEvidence papers
Software maintenance and evolution
software updates
0.112020
"My Library Has Just Been Obliterated": Producing New Norms of Use Via Software Update · CHI 2020

Methods — techniques the papers use, named apart from their topics

qualitative analysis of user reactions · 0.9
YearPublicationVenuePosition
2020 "My Library Has Just Been Obliterated": Producing New Norms of Use Via Software Update
abstract
Software updates are commonly perceived as tools for fixing flaws and improving functionality. In this paper, we problematise this view by showing how software updates may also be used by vendors to create new norms of use that control user behaviour and reduce their agency. We explore the nature and aftermath of a controversial software update that was released by Spotify in June 2019. By analysing almost 3,500 reactions to this update, we show how it removed and modified several features in ways that severely affected users' capability to organise, navigate, and maintain their music libraries, while it pushed modes of listening that delegate song selection to Spotify. Elaborating upon our results, we discuss how updates may be used as political tools that privilege certain forms of behaviour while restricting others. We also portray updates as sites where ongoing struggles and negotiations regarding user agency and digital ownership take place.
Fabio Morreale, Maria Eriksson
CHI2